Answer: 201.06 in²
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the equation πr² to find out the area of a circle.
Since the diameter is 16 the radius is half of that, 8.
π(8)²
Work out that equation and you're done!
Hello :
the equation <span>y+4=(x-3) for the line passes by the point : (3 , - 4 )
when the slope is : 1 </span>
Answer:
There are many.
Step-by-step explanation:
When you say proportional, you are looking for a ratio that is equivalent to the ratio given. In your case, there are many so you might need to be more specific. But still, we can help you figure it out.
An easy way to do this would be to scale it down to its simplest form and then move upwards. To find proportional ratios, just multiply denominator and the denominator with the same factor.

That is your ratio in its simplest form. Now we can scale up, I'll show you how to do one completely:

That's the same ratio scaled up by a factor of 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's the ratio given
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scaled up by a factor of 4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scaled up by a factor of 5.
The list goes on and on.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The carving was made from a scale model with a scale of 1 inch = 1 foot. This means that one foot on the actual carving is represented by one inch on the model. So the model is smaller than the actual carving.
On the model, Teddy Roosevelt's mustache was 1 foot by 8 inches long.
We would convert the 1 foot on the model to inches because the model is represented in inches
12 inches = 1 foot
This means that on the model, Teddy Roosevelt's mustache was 12 inches by 8 inches long. Therefore,
Teddy Roosevelt's mustache was 12 feets by 8 feets long on the monument or carving

The rows add up to

, respectively. (Notice they're all powers of 2)
The sum of the numbers in row

is

.
The last problem can be solved with the binomial theorem, but I'll assume you don't take that for granted. You can prove this claim by induction. When

,

so the base case holds. Assume the claim holds for

, so that

Use this to show that it holds for

.



Notice that






So you can write the expansion for

as

and since

, you have

and so the claim holds for

, thus proving the claim overall that

Setting

gives

which agrees with the result obtained for part (c).