Answer: Legal- rational Leadership style
Explanation:
The rational-legal style also known as transactional leadership is when a leader exercises control and authority on the basis of his knowledge to his subordinates.
Transactional leader is someone who values order and structure based on rules and regulations to complete task on time. Transactional leaders do not encourage personal creativity and innovative ideas because They depend on people who work well in a structured, directed environment ruled by influence and control.
Their main focus is on RESULTS, conformity to the existing structure of an organization and measures success based on the organization’s system of rewards and penalties. This type of leader is responsible for maintaining routine by managing and monitoring individual and group performance.
This type of leader sets the criteria for their workers according to existing defined requirements. Performance reviews are the most common way to judge employee performance.
Transactional leaders differ from other leaders like the charismatic and transformational leaders in that it is only results oriented.
In a nut shell, the legal rational Leadership style focuses on the give and take style based on controlling the performance of the individual and determining how well he or she can deliver in a structured environment.
We can then infer that the boss follows the legal-rational leadership style.
Answer:
T
You could apply this to math by counting the number of people he saved or the number of fatalities
Whyed you write random words on Mine?
A thematic map is a map that focuses on a specific theme or subject area, whereas in a general map the variety of phenomena—geological, geographical, political—regularly appear together.<span> The contrast between them lies in the fact that thematic maps use the base data, such as coastlines, boundaries and places, only my points of reference for the phenomenon being mapped. General maps portray the base data, such as landforms, lines of transportation, settlements, and political boundaries, for their own sake.</span>
