Reform social welfare department
Based on the options given, the most likely answer to this query is the behavioral approach system Bas and the behavioral inhibition system are the basis of personalityThank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
<span>In a centrally planned economy, the government owns and operates production facilities and manages the flow of supply and demand rather than allowing interactions between businesses and consumers to determine supply and demand.
In a pure market economy the government has no role. Instead, the market makes all allocation decisions.
In a market economy, the government does not oversee the day to day micro transactions. Instead, it oversees the economy, making sure that it steps in to stabilize the market if it is going through a recession. The government is also allowed to step in and prevent trade or business with any country that it feels is a threat.
In a mixed economy, the government can create a central plan that guides the economy. The government is also allowed to own important industries, such as aerospace or banking. In some mixed economies the government handles social programs like welfare or retirement.</span>
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the other country's actions as unreasonable and motivated by evil intentions. This situation best illustrates:
the mere exposure effect.
the just-world phenomenon.
mirror-image perceptions.
deindividuation.
social facilitation.
None of the listed answers are correct
Answer:
This situation best illustrates mirror-image perceptions.
Explanation:
The term mirror-image perception refers to the human tendency of viewing others as the enemy, as evil, especially in a situation of conflict. It is called mirror-image because both people or sides involved in the conflict see themselves as good, and the other as the villain. That is precisely the case described in the passage. Both leaders do not see a problem concerning their own buildup of their military forces - they "know" they are doing it for good reasons. But both of them also think that the other leader doing it is a sign of evil intentions on his part.
Members of congress often resist taking action to limit presidential power because if they belong to the same party, they would not want to interfere with the actions of the president, for sharing the same ideals and the same political objectives, usually the majority is sought in the congress to act with greater freedom with respect to the state policy proposed by the president.
