Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
Answer:
Arbitrary Inference
Explanation:
Arbitrary inference is a mental illusion where the lack of supporting evidence shapes a conclusion of an case. Lack of evidence leads to a false inference, it is a cognitive distortion in which a person draws a conclusion that is unrelated to or contradicted by the evidence.
When Lara came home from work, she was expecting to be greeted by her children, but flthat didn't happen which lead her to conclude that something is wrong with evidence , this illustrate lara arbitrary inference. She formed an interpretation of a situation without having an evidence.
Answer:
d. neurotransmitter
Explanation:
In this definition, Anna was very close to successfully describing long-term potentiation. However, her definition is inaccurate because she mistook neurons for neurotransmitters. Long-term potentiation is the strengthening of synapses (or the enhancement of communication) between two neurons. These patterns of synaptic activity produce a long-lasting increase in signal transmission. This phenomenon occurs thanks to synaptic plasticity, which is the ability of chemical synapses to change their strength.
Answer: As a result an informal norm has become a law.
Even before states had started making it illegal for people to drive while using cell phones, grouping of individuals had already stood against this practice. Thus, we can say that the social movement started at the beginning of the 21st century was what actually made this law come true.
Answer:Straight Re-buy
Explanation:
This example Represent straight re-buy .re-buy.re three types of buying option
Straight re-buy is a process in which a consumer buys identical goods in an identical amount from an approved seller on the list under identical terms.
Here also Coca-cola offering its service to the same restaurant every month representing the Straight re-buy process.
