Answer: Hebbian learning
Explanation: This is a type of learning which involves strengthening connections between neurons which work together. The repeated exposure to a particular stimulus can strengthen connections within a distinctive subset of cortical neurons, and this subset can provide a reliable basis for identifying the stimulus that is activating them.
It has been proven that even when an individual encounters an incomplete version of a familiar stimulus with only some of the subset of neurons representing that familiar stimulus activated at first, the connections already established through repeated coactivity will produce results that complete the familiar pattern.
Answer:
- Explanatory
Explanation:
<u>Explanatory variable</u> is elucidated as the variable that could affect the response variable. This variable is quite identical with the independent variable as it can be controlled or changed that may affect the response variable(which is similar to dependent variable). However, the observational studies observe the natural responses without any manipulation and therefore, these variables cannot be changed always. In the given example, the 'number of hours spent on studying for the test' would be the explanatory variable as it directly influences the response variable i.e. 'grades.'
People or firm often support whoever they want in an election. AT&T’s campaign favors Democratic candidates but also donates to Republicans.
Political campaigns are often regarded as work aimed to get a desired candidate to get elected or pass an issue.
People often campaign for the candidate of their choice, they even raise funds and make sure that every thing is in place. AT&T’s often to both parties as they do not support one over the other.
See full question below
What conclusion can be drawn based on AT&T’s campaign donation records?
It only donates to presidential candidates.
It favors Republican candidates but also donates to Democrats
It favors Democratic candidates but also donates to Republicans.
It donates only to Republican candidates.
Learn more about AT&T’s campaign from
brainly.com/question/4442594
Answer:
peer testimony
Explanation:
As should be obvious in the entry, the individual Kim is citing isn't a specialist in youngster abuse. It's anything but an individual who has led contemplates and broke down information on the issue. In this manner, what we have is a peer declaration. A peer testimony is given by somebody who doesn't have mastery in a specific issue. The individual cited by Kim has some involvement with the feeling that he/she has endured injury concerning child abuse. That individual is a casualty whose life is as yet influenced by what occurred. His/Her declaration doesn't originate from instruction, confirmation, preparing, or abilities. It originates from having endured abuse.
