The Supreme Court's landmark decision regarding judicial review is Marbury v. Madison<span>. </span>Marbury<span> was the first Supreme Court decision to strike down an </span>act of Congress<span> as unconstitutional</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
Answer:
I think its the first one
sry if I'm wrong
Among the choices the one that is correct is letter B which is "<span>The trial would begin in state-level appellate and go to the federal court of appeal if the verdict is challenged."
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
Answer:
D. strong ego.
Explanation:
Strong ego: The term strong ego refers to the process in which an individual believes in his or her abilities to cope up with difficult situations or problems and thinks that he or she will find alternatives or various ways to deal with ongoing struggles.
An individual having a strong ego can face or deal with whatever comes in his or her way without losing a sense of self.
People having strong ego strength are considered to be very resilient while facing difficult life situations.
In the question above, Hafez shows signs of a strong ego.
