Answer:
A strict ruler and a strong legal system is needed to create an orderly society.
Explanation:
The first emperor of unified China, Shi Huangdi, believed in Legalism, a philosophy that stated: "A strict ruler and a strong legal system is needed to create an orderly society."
This is evident when Han Fei-Tzu, a Legalist and the tutor of Shi Huangdi, claimed that "The ruler alone should possess the power, wielding it like lightning or like thunder."
Hence, legalism is based on the belief that to be good members of society, people need to be governed by a powerful ruler, stringent laws, and severe punishments.
The answer is "You still might want to determine if there are any barriers to performance."
Performance gap refers to the difference between the present circumstance and the expected circumstance. Execution hole investigation enables a business to recognize how far it has come toward achieving its objectives and how far despite everything it needs to go to accomplish them, with the target of building up a solid procedure to close any current gap.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es ls siguiente.
A pesar de que no se incluyen opciones o incisos para responder a esta pregunta, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
Las actitudes que contribuyen a convivir con la diversidad son las siguientes.
Primero que nada, el respeto. Sin respeto a la diversidad en las personas, no podemos avanzar en el tema.
La siguiente actitud es la tolerancia. La tolerancia va de la mano con el respeto.
La tercera actitud es la compresión, la cual nos permite mostrar compasión por las ideas de los demás.
La cuarta actitud es la empatía, sí, el ponernos en el lugar de la otra persona para saber el por qué piensa y actúa de determinada manera o diferente a la nuestra.
Una última actitud pudiera ser la reciprocidad, entendiendo que lo que nosotros ofrezcamos, es vamos a recibir de los demás.
Answer:
<h3>The Brown v Board of Education case addresses whether public institutions can legally be divided by race.
</h3>
Explanation:
- The Brown v School of Education was a landmark case regarding public school segregation on the basis of race.
- Thurgood Marshall was the chief attorney for the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education. The plaintiff attorney ruled out that segregation policy violated the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
- The case won an unanimous verdict against school segregation.
- After the case was won, the Supreme Court outlawed the practice of segregation in any public institutions.
Its C. Cause of what happened more people sutered cause there was no additional help
