1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Debora [2.8K]
3 years ago
14

Mesopotamia and Egypt were our founding nations of early civilization. With close trading ties between them, we see similarities

between the two nations, but they also have major differences. In 100-200 words, explain 2 similarities and 1 difference between the two.
History
1 answer:
lawyer [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: Egypt took development around the Nile River. Mesopotamia developed between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. Both Egypt and Mesopotamia had governments. Those governments ran with one main ruler. Egypt had a centralized government with a Pharaoh, instead of a king like Mesopotamia. Both civilizations emerged around 3500 and 3000 BCE. Both civilizations shared differences and similarities between religion, culture etc.

Explanation:

You may keep researching or build and elaborate on what I have given you, cheers!

You might be interested in
The backlash noted in the newspaper clipping above was expected in the south because the law :
andre [41]

Answer:

The answer would be A

8 0
4 years ago
Why were tax laws like the Stamp Act, Sugar Act, and Townshend Acts passed by England?
alexandr1967 [171]
C) to pay off war debt from the french and indian war


sorry if i’m wrong
6 0
2 years ago
The assembly called for a "bill of rights" that would list U.S. citizens':
Rudik [331]
I know the answer is Immunities and freedom, but where would that go under here
8 0
3 years ago
What is the 27th amendment
Vadim26 [7]
The 27th amendment states that changes to the Congressional pay must happen after the current term is over. Hope this helps! :)
4 0
3 years ago
BRAINLIEST ASAP!!! 99 POINTS!!! PLEASE HURRY!!!
OleMash [197]

The checks and balances keep every branch of the govt. from victimization their job to induce too powerful. the perspective of Federalists on ratifying the Constitution is that a powerful national government is required to shield voters from threats, which the Constitution ought to be sanctioned like a shot to stop injury. the perspective of Anti-federalists on ratifying the Constitution is that the Constitution doesn't give enough protection for people's rights, which there's Not enough protection for powers of state governments.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is an accurate description of banking in the United States? A. Wall Street B. an economic institution C.
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement describes a similarity between source 1 and source 2?
    7·1 answer
  • Discuss the legacy of european colonialism in africa in terms of language and religion
    9·1 answer
  • How did the great compromise resolve the conflict between states with large populations and states with small populations?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did lincoln's election as president convince southerners that they lost their voice in the national government?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the result of the Declaration of Independence?
    11·1 answer
  • True or False. Texas was the Lone Star Republic before it became part of the United States.​
    7·2 answers
  • Recap on the situation
    12·1 answer
  • Where did Andrew Jackson draw his primary presidential support from?
    11·1 answer
  • I need a 3 sentence about the C!NN 10 for today Fed 3
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!