1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gennadij [26K]
3 years ago
8

Identify Adam Smith’s major contributions to classical liberal economic theory and his view of government’s proper role in the e

conomy.
Social Studies
1 answer:
svet-max [94.6K]3 years ago
5 0

AnswAnswer:

  • Adam Smith’s major contributions to classical liberal economic theory were the concept of "THE INVISIBLE HAND"
  • his view of government’s proper role in the economy was "NOT PARTICIPATION"

Explanation:

Adam Smith is considerate as the father of <u>capitalism</u>. His main contribution to the classical liberal economic theory was the concept of "THE INVISIBLE HAND" (introduced in the book <u>The Wealth of the Nation</u>): he developed the idea of the existence of an invisible hand which function is regulating the markets. <u>The markets will regulate by itself</u>, by the power of this "hand" and they will find the balance by the actions of the demand and supply.

Government proper role in the economy is limited: as "THE INVISIBLE HAND" regulates the markets (by the action of the supply and demand), the government action is to  "<em>laissez-faire laissez passer</em>" (let things alone, let thing pass), it should not interfere or regulate business or industries. The G must let the private sector do without public intervention trying to regulate and controlling the private business.

The Government is like a referee, not as a participant in the economy. It must provide their population defense and laws to protect and contribute to a free society.

You might be interested in
PLS PLS PLS HELP
ANTONII [103]

Answer:

The election of 1860 was one of the most pivotal presidential elections in American history. It pitted Republican nominee Abraham Lincoln against Democratic Party nominee Senator Stephen Douglas, Southern Democratic Party nominee John Breckinridge and Constitutional Union Party nominee John Bell. The main issue of the election was slavery and states’ rights. Lincoln emerged victorious and became the 16th President of the United States during a national crisis that would tear states and families apart and test Lincoln’s leadership and resolve: The Civil War.

Lincoln’s Political History

Abraham Lincoln’s political ambitions began in 1832 when he was just 23 years old and ran for the Illinois House of Representatives. While he lost that election, two years later, he was elected to the state legislature as a member of the Whig party, where he publicly announced his disdain for slavery.

In 1847, Lincoln was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives where, on January 10, 1849, he introduced a bill to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia. The bill didn’t pass, but it opened the door for later anti-slavery legislation.  

In 1858, Lincoln ran for the Senate, this time as a Republican against Illinois Democrat Stephen A. Douglas. He lost the election but gained prominence for himself and the newly established Republican Party.

1860 Republican National Convention

The Republican Party held its second national convention on May 16, 1860, in Chicago, Illinois. It adopted a moderate stance on slavery and was against its expansion, although some delegates wanted the institution abolished altogether.

The two frontrunners for the Republican presidential nomination were Lincoln and New York Senator William Seward. After three votes, Lincoln was nominated with Hannibal Hamlin as his running mate.

Democrats Split Over Slavery

The Democratic Party was in shambles in 1860. They should have been the party of unity, but instead were divided on the issue of slavery. Southern Democrats thought slavery should be expanded but Northern Democrats opposed the idea.

States’ rights were also hotly debated. Southern Democrats felt states had the right to govern themselves while Northern Democrats supported the Union and a national government.

With such confusion among the ranks, it was unclear how the Democratic Party would ever nominate a candidate for the 1860 election. But on April 23, 1860, they met in Charleston, South Carolina to decide their platform and identify a nominee.

Stephen Douglas was the frontrunner, but Southern Democrats refused to support him because he wouldn’t adopt a pro-slavery platform. Many walked out in protest, leaving the remaining delates without the majority needed to nominate Douglas; the convention ended without a nominee.

The Democrats met again two months later in Baltimore. Once again, many Southern delegates left in disgust, but enough remained to nominate Douglas as their presidential nominee and his running mate, former Georgia governor Herschel Johnson.

Southern Democrats nominated John Breckinridge, a supporter of slavery and states’ rights, to represent them in the election. Oregon senator Joseph Lane was his running mate.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
The DOD has directed that the U.S. military will, unless otherwise directed by competent authority, comply with the principles a
viktelen [127]

Answer: False

Explanation:

Article VI of the US Constitution allows for the equal status of treaties that the US enters into with laws passed by Congress. As a result, the Law of Armed Conflict is considered law for all bound by US law including and especially the US military and as a result, the US has decided to apply the Law to all military operations.

7 0
4 years ago
After World War I, a war hero named Mustafa Kemal Atatürk took over Turkey’s government and ruled as a totalitarian despot.
ehidna [41]
Yes,,,,i think it is trueeeee
7 0
3 years ago
The Comanches ruled over_____
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

the plains

Explanation:

This should be the right answer if the question was about the area they controlled.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Managers often think they can know and predict everything regarding a problem, even when a situation has a completely unpredicta
il63 [147K]
<span>Managers often think they can know and predict everything regarding a problem, even when a situation has a completely unpredictable outcome. this, after the fact, "i knew it all along" belief fallacy is known as HINDSIGHT BIAS.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the effect of the Khmer farmers' surplus?
    9·1 answer
  • What idea regarding states’ rights did the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions support?
    12·2 answers
  • What is a laissez-faire government?
    14·1 answer
  • The ability to allow political parties to have a strong voice in national politics is an attribute of A. an anarchy. B. a democr
    9·2 answers
  • What do you call a franchise owner’s share of earnings that is given as a payment to a parent company?
    15·2 answers
  • why is it challenging to develop a problem statement for a project? what action can you take to work around this challenge to id
    10·1 answer
  • Which group makes the final determination about whether a law conflicts the Florida Constitution?
    10·1 answer
  • dontrell and ebony are expecting their first child this week, but dontrell has an important meeting at corporate headquarters. t
    8·1 answer
  • What new route did explore Christopher Columbus follow in the 1492
    8·1 answer
  • Our education system socializes us to our society. We learn ________ which are reinforced by our teachers, our textbooks, and ou
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!