Answer: D. can say that Chan is buying the utility-maximizing amounts of donuts and cheese.
Explanation: Utility is the amount of satisfaction derived from consuming a product or service. In the question above, Chan is deriving the same amount of satisfaction/utillity (25 utils) from the quantity of donuts and cheese that he buys. There is no reason to change the ratio in which he buys them.
If he was deriving more satisfaction from one of the two, we could say that he should buy more of that item to maximize his satisfaction. But this is not the case.
Answer:
2. Only counting final goods
Explanation:
When defining national income accounting and terminolgies, emphasis is always laid on "...total value of FINAL goods...". This is as a result of avoiding double counting. If intermediate goods were counted alongside final goods, it would be double counting because intermediate goods are used in producing those final goods. Final goods are good meant for final consumption. The other method used in avoiding double counting ( counting of the value of the same product more than once) apart from counting final gooda is Value added approach.
Answer:
Bing can immediately sue for breach of contract
Explanation:
Based on the scenario that is being described, Bing can immediately sue for breach of contract. Breaching a contract is when one party in a binding agreement fails to deliver according to the terms of the agreement. When Dill made an anticipatory repudiation, he basically stated that he does not intend to live up to the obligations of the contract that he had agreed to, therefore breaching the contract and becoming liable.
Answer:
C. Sales promotion
Explanation:
Because you're giving good value and time and effort for doing it basically because that's being economical