True or false: Global marketing strategies are essential for 21st century businesses.

Financial data for Joel de Paris, Inc., for last year follow:

suter [353]

Answer:

profit margin: 7.09%

Turnover:

Assets : 1.85

Account Receivable: 11.53

Inventory: 9.05

ROI: 28.94%

2.- residual income 91,395

Explanation:

sales 4,700,000

net income 333,000

profit margin:

net income / sales

333,000 / 4,700,000 = 0,070851 = 7.09%

Turnovers:

Will be sales over an asset account to calcualte how many times the assets converts to cash or rotate.

the average will be calcualte as (beginning + ending)/2

Assets turnover:

sales/average assets

sales 4,700,000

(2,505,000 + 2,585,000) / 2 = 2,545,000

Ratio: 1,8467 = 1.85

Account Receivable Turnover:

sales/ average turnover

sales 4,700,000

(344,000 +471,000)/2 = 407,500

Ratio: 11,5337 = 11.53

Inventory Turnover

Sales/ average inventory

Sales 4,700,000

(568,000 + 471,000)/2 = 519,500

Inventory turnover: 9,04716 = 9.05

ROI

net income / average equity

where:

average equity : (beginning + ending)/2

1,092,000 + 1,209,000 = 1,150,500

333,000/1,150,500 = 0,28943

Residual income:

net income - Equity x expected return

333,000 - 1,150,500 x 0.21 =

333,000 - 241,605‬ = 91,395

5 0

3 years ago

Assume that the marginal propensity to consume is 0.8 and that potential output is $800 billion. If real GDP is $850 billion, to

kari74 [83]

The following policies would bring the economy to potential output is Decrease government spending by $10 billion.

<h3>What is Marginal Propensity?</h3>

The "Marginal Propensity" to consume is defined as calculate quantification of money that consumers are ready to spend.

The term "Marginal propensity" to consume is term used in economics. It measures monetary value which consumer is willing to spend to buy goods and services instead of saving it.

The "Marginal Propensity" to consume tends to increase economic activities of country by keeping cash flowing and by not keeping it stagnant. It also helps in increasing trade value and quality and cost of products because it increases healthy competition among companies and in which consumers are ultimately benefitted.

Therefore , we can conclude that the correct option is C.

Learn more about Marginal propensity on:

brainly.com/question/17930875

#SPJ4

7 0

2 years ago

Using these data from the comparative balance sheet of Blossom Company, perform vertical analysis. (Round percentages to 1 decim

vovikov84 [41]

Answer:

For 2017

Account receivable % = Account Receivable/Total Assets x 100

Account receivable % = $ 497,000/$ 3,101,000 * 100

Account receivable % = 0.16027088 * 100

Account receivable % = 16.0%

Inventory % = Inventory/Total Assets *100

Inventory % = $ 735,000/$ 3,101,000 * 100

Inventory % = 0.2370203 * 100

Inventory % = 23.7 %

Total Assets = $3,101,000 = 100%

For 2016

Account receivable % = Account Receivable/Total Assets * 100

Account receivable % = $ 435,000/$ 2,758,000 * 100

Account receivable % = 0.15772298 * 100

Account receivable % = 15.8%

Inventory % = Inventory/Total Assets * 100

Inventory % = $555,000/$ 2,758,000 * 100

Inventory % = 0.20123277 * 100

Inventory % = 20.1%

Total Assets = $2,758,000 = 100 %

7 0

3 years ago

The Coase theorem states that A) the private sector will fail to produce the efficient amount of a public good because of the fr

Sonja [21]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

One of the problems in economics is the allocation of goods in the presence of externalities. When externalities are present allocation of goods in private market won't be efficient because private parties won't internalize them and would arrive to an inefficient outcome. For many years this was an argument in favor of government intervention.

However, Ronald Coase showed that assigning property rights of the externality to one of the private parties (no matter which one) would result in an efficient outcome. This is because the parties with the property right would then internalize the cost. Then in the bargaining process private parties would reach an efficient outcome without the intervention of the government.

7 0

3 years ago

If the economy starts below full employment, an expansionary fiscal policy will shift the aggregate demand curve from _____ to _

MrRissso [65]

The expansionary fiscal policy will shift the aggregate demand curve from AD0 to AD1 and equilibrium will move from point a to b if the economy starts below full employment.

<h3>What is the below full employment?</h3>

Its means when an the short-run real gross domestic product is lower than that same long-run potential real gross domestic product.

Hence, the economic situation will elicit a policy of expansionary fiscal which will affect the aggregate demand graph.

Therefore, the aggregate demand curve from AD0 to AD1 and equilibrium will move from point a to b if the economy starts below full employment.