<span>A parallelogram is a 4-sided shape where opposites sides are parallel. A rectangle is a special case of a parallelogram. All rectangles are parallelograms.
But a rectangle is a shape where opposites sides are parallel *and* all the corners are 90 degree angles. So you can't say that all parallelograms would be rectangles. Some parallelograms would be rectangles, but not all.
Rectangles are a subset of the shapes called parallelograms. But parallelograms are *not* a subset of the shapes called rectangles.
It's similar to saying all cars are vehicles. But you can't say that all vehicles are cars. </span>
This is the concept of geometry, for us to prove the similarity of angles we can use the following postulates:
SAS (side-angle-side)
ASA (Angle side Angle)
SSS (side side side)
AAS (Angle Angle side)
therefore, given that AAA is used to prove similarity, another postulate that can be used to strengthen the postulate is SAS, because we already have the angle sizes, adding more sides will make the prove even stronger since we shall have three corresponding angles plus wo corresponding sides.
There’s no image to show the outliers