Answer:
Religion has immensely shaped the cultural landacape. In terms of belief and certain practices, it is unequivocally believed that religion has done more good in the lives of people by making them jettison some fetish lifestyle which was stylishly affecting their health.
In some part of Africa, when the husband of a woman died and the kinsmen somehow believe it wasn't a timely death, certain traditional practices like bathing the corpse pouring some of the water he was bathed with into a calabash and given to the woman to drink to clear herself from the accusation has been abolished by Christian religion. Such practice is very dangerous to health as bacteria from the dead body which has stayed for days is been transferred to the woman.
Secondly, architecturally, the structures today as religion has come into villages of the world has changed. Living in bushes, mud houses meant for the gods of the land in those days has been abolished. People live comfortable in a well built house today.
In giving names to kids, no one gives devilish meaningless names to their kids because religion has taught it brings bad luck to the innocent born child. Religion made it known that the name of a person has a clear effect in his life and lifetime. Therefore, unfortunate names are no more given to new born.:
Persistence in cybersecurity occurs when a threat actor discreetly maintains long-term access to systems despite disruptions such as restarts or changed credentials.
Bad actors can place an implant or a “stub” that both evades automated antivirus solutions and kick starts more malware.
<h3>What is persistent access?</h3>
Persistence consists of techniques that adversaries use to keep access to systems across restarts, changed credentials, and other interruptions that could cut off their access.
<h3>Why is persistence so important?</h3>
Persistence gives you vital experience. When you're persistent, you learn that each failure gives you another opportunity to learn. With each failure, you'll become more resilient. You'll also learn how you can overcome any challenges.
Learn more about persistence here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/14970883</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Congressman has to respond to the Big Pizza Lobby taking these considerations in mind.
Congressman has to realize the impact of the presence of this big "company" in the market. Not only for other industries that cannot compete with this huge company but the impact it has on consumers.
The congressman would propose the kind of bill that benefits free trade, competence, and benefits consumers in a free market.
The big company is not going to stay "arms-folded." The company is going to hire lobbyists to negotiate with congressmen in order to promote its particular agendas and personal interests.
Of course, the big company wants to change the rules against it, and modify them to facilitate their interests. The negotiations can make legislators doubt or rethink a regulation. That is when Congressman has to think to support the interests of citizens, who were the ones who took him/her to office in the elections. So congressmen serve the people, not large companies.
