I think its the first one the sentence looks fine with out a comma.
Answer:
The two types of horror stories described in lines 51-63 are:
- Stories that deals with parallel world.
- Stories that seems supernatural but have natural explanations.
Russell's purpose for describing the two types of stories is to support her claim of 'what horror genre is to her'?
Explanation:
'What is Horror Genre?' is a literary criticism by Sharon A. Russell. In her literary criticism Sharon describes the way how she analyze a horror genre.
Sharon was the first one to analyze Stephen King's work, in this study, she aids readers how to evaluate and analyze horror genre, as she did.
In lines 51-63, Russell identifies two types of horror stories.
First are those stories that deal with parallel world. In such stories, readers tend to believe the world as it is, without any question. To support this claim, Russell gives an example of children's fiction 'The Wizard of Oz' by L. Frank Baum. She asserts that the world represented in the Oz is accepted by the readers just as it is without any question. This is the first type of horror stories or genre.
The second one are those stories that seems to be supernatural but have natural explanations. To elaborate this type of story, Russell exemplifies by stating that in such stories objects take the role of supernatural.
The purpose of Russell to describe these two stories is to support her main idea of the text. As she is trying to exemplify 'What is horror genre?' to her, she is elaborating her points using supportive examples.
It is feautrured in Songs of Experience because the poem talks about the experience of a tiger. It is a suspense poem. Indeed, the life of a tiger is full of suspenses. The poem's opening lines are:
Tyger Tyger, burning bright,
In the forests of the night;
What immortal hand or eye,
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
The poet praises the the qualities of the tiger by asking questions without answering them. In the remaining lines of the poem, the author continues praising the perfectness of the animal, calling it dark craftsmanship. The thought-provoking point is about the comparison between The Tyger and the previous poem The Lamb which the poet himself doubts that the same God could create innocent spirit like a lamb and such a fierce animal like tiger at the same time. or it could be interpreted as God's different expressions showing his kindness in the face of lamb and his anger in the qualities of tiger.
I think it is. Social commentary incites the use of symbolism and plot to determine an end result that can be connected to something happening in society or past events. Not only this but literature pieces such as Animal Farm use symbolism to explain/describe events in history. Even Dr. Suess provided social commentary in his children' books. The message conveyed through these writers can be perceived on multiple levels, which I find fascinating as I have an entirely new perspective on Dr. Suess now vs as a child.
Answer:
They feel more connected to American culture than their ancestors’ culture.
Explanation:
The first paragraph refers to an American girl of Asian descent. Reading the paragraph, we can see that the girl is not comfortable with her Asian ancestry and is more integrated into American culture. This can be seen from the lines "I have always felt funny using chopsticks and my favorite food is hot dogs."
On the other hand, in the second paragraph, we realize that the girl has Mexican descent, since her grandmother speaks Spanish and the title of the text "Mericanos". The girl feels good about American culture, but is a little uncomfortable with Mexican culture as she responds to her grandmother rudely when speaking in Spanish.
In both paragraphs we can conclude that girls feel more connected to American culture than their ancestors' culture.
