1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
makkiz [27]
3 years ago
9

Why was the discovery of gold seen as a negative event?

History
2 answers:
zlopas [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It would bring increased population to California.

neonofarm [45]3 years ago
4 0

The answer is A. It would bring increased population to California.

You might be interested in
Can anyone help on any of these plzzzz
Paul [167]

Answer:

number 10 should be the second one

Explanation:

9 would be to stop the spread of communism

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements about federal student loans is ひ?
soldi70 [24.7K]

i dont know soooo yea

6 0
3 years ago
Where did the American revolution come from
mash [69]

Answer:

Described as "the shot heard round the world," British soldiers (also called red coats) in April of 1775 and minutemen (the colonists' militia) exchanged gunfire at Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts. This signaled the start of the American Revolution.

Best of luck!

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?
scZoUnD [109]

Throughout their history in the Promised Land, the children of Israel struggled with conflict among the tribes. The disunity went back all the way to the patriarch Jacob, who presided over a house divided. The sons of Leah and the sons of Rachel had their share of contention even in Jacob’s lifetime (Genesis 37:1-11).


The enmity among the half-brothers continued in the time of the judges. Benjamin (one of Rachel’s tribes) took up arms against the other tribes (Judges 20). Israel’s first king, Saul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. When David was crowned king—David was from the tribe of Judah (one of Leah’s tribes)—the Benjamites rebelled (2 Samuel 2–3). After a long war (2 Samuel 3:1), David succeeded in uniting all twelve tribes (5:1-5).


The frailty of the union was exposed, however, when David’s son Absalom promoted himself as the new king and drew many Israelites away from their allegiance to David (2 Samuel 15). Significantly, Absalom set up his throne in Hebron, the site of the former capital (v. 10). A later revolt was led by a man named Sheba against David and the tribe of Judah (20:1-2).


The reign of David’s son Solomon saw more unrest when one of the king’s servants, Jeroboam, rebelled. Jeroboam was on the king’s errand when he met the prophet Ahijah, who told him that God was going to give him authority over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel. God’s reason for the division of the kingdom was definitive: “Because they have forsaken me . . . and have not walked in my ways.” However, God promised that David’s dynasty would continue, albeit over a much smaller kingdom, for the sake of God’s covenant with David and for the sake of Jerusalem, God’s chosen city. When Solomon learned of the prophecy, he sought to kill Jeroboam, who fled to Egypt for sanctuary (1 Kings 11:26-40).


After Solomon’s death, his son Rehoboam was set to become the next king. Jeroboam returned from Egypt and led a group of people to confront Rehoboam with a demand for a lighter tax burden. When Rehoboam refused the demand, ten of the tribes rejected Rehoboam and David’s dynasty (1 Kings 12:16), and Ahijah’s prophecy was fulfilled. Only Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to King Rehoboam. The northern tribes crowned Jeroboam as their king. Rehoboam made plans to mount an assault on the rebel tribes, but the Lord prevented him from taking that action (vv. 21-24). Meanwhile, Jeroboam further consolidated his power by instituting a form of calf worship unique to his kingdom and declaring that pilgrimages to Jerusalem were unnecessary. Thus, the people of the northern tribes would have no contact with the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.


“So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day” (1 Kings 12:19). The northern kingdom is called “Israel” (or sometimes “Ephraim”) in Scripture, and the southern kingdom is called “Judah.” From the divine viewpoint, the division was a judgment on not keeping God’s commands, specifically the commands prohibiting idolatry. From a human viewpoint, the division was the result of tribal discord and political unrest. The principle is that sin brings division (1 Corinthians 1:13, 11:18; James 4:1).


The good news is that God, in His mercy, has promised a reuniting of the northern and southern kingdoms. “He will raise a banner for the nations / and gather the exiles of Israel; / he will assemble the scattered people of Judah / from the four quarters of the earth. / Ephraim’s jealousy will vanish, / and Judah’s enemies will be destroyed; / Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, / nor Judah hostile toward Ephraim” (Isaiah 11:12-13). When the Prince of Peace—Jesus Christ—reigns in His millennial kingdom, all hostility, jealousy, and conflict among the tribes will be put to rest.


4 0
3 years ago
Exit which of the following is not a purpose of a national convention?
cestrela7 [59]
<span>C. Pick presidential and vice-presidential candidates</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What does the bergeron process explain? question 10 options:?
    5·1 answer
  • Can you put this in order please (look at the picture)
    10·2 answers
  • The showed Americans the Vietnam War was not nearly over as the government had suggested.
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement summarizes the effects of slave labor on the colonial economy?
    15·2 answers
  • Here’s my question lol
    15·1 answer
  • Which glided age president was known for his integrity
    7·1 answer
  • __________ refers to the average number of people that live within a specific unit in an area/region.
    9·1 answer
  • What did King George III place in the colonies without their permission even during times of peace?HELPP
    15·1 answer
  • How were herotodus and thucydides different?
    11·1 answer
  • How does the temperance movement compare to the other movements of the Progressive<br> Era?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!