1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mel-nik [20]
3 years ago
9

What is the most common reason people oppose the liberalization of social policy, such as to allow same-sex marriage or abortion

rights for women?
Select one:
A. concerns about the economic cost of these rights
B. progressive social values
C. concerns that their own rights will be violated
D. traditional religious or moral values
Law
2 answers:
Elis [28]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

b

Explanation:

bixtya [17]3 years ago
6 0
The correct anawser is b because it is
You might be interested in
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
Offenders report to jail only during weekends or other designated times
Anettt [7]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is an example of a delegated power?
Dahasolnce [82]
I mean establishing trials in court I believe is one and I also believe managing American territories is one as well, I’m sorry I couldn’t help more
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do lawmakers feel about lobbyists?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

"The relationship between lobbyists and lawmakers is complicated. On one hand, lobbyists pursue relationships with lawmakers in order to shape legislation so that it benefits clients who would be affected by new laws or regulations. On the other hand, lobbyists are frequently targeted by lawmakers as sources of campaign money, which the lobbyists feel beholden to give to improve their clients' prospects of success. "

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
C. The length, breadth and height of the box is 5m,6m and 7m respectively. Find its volume.​
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

VOLUME = LENGTH ×BREADTH × HEIGHT

= 5m × 6m × 7m

=210 m^3(metercube)

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Compared to the president of the United States, the governor of California has less visibility and public recognition. Yet, why
    5·2 answers
  • What do you wanna be
    5·2 answers
  • How many executive orders / actions have the last 6 presidents used? And what is the most important one in your opinion?
    9·1 answer
  • __________ is the name given to the written decision of a case that has been agreed to by more than half of the supreme court.
    14·1 answer
  • House was riding his bike on a city street. While he was riding, he frequently looked back to verify that the books that he had
    7·1 answer
  • What was a major problem with the central government under the Articles of Confederation?
    13·2 answers
  • Steps taken for arrest warrant
    6·1 answer
  • specifies which people in a sport organization are required to report suspected child abuse to law enforcement.
    13·1 answer
  • Drag each characteristic to the correct location on the table. Each characteristic will be used only once.
    8·1 answer
  • 6. Describe one thing you think your representative should do.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!