Answer:
Explanation:
The gravitational potential energy can be found using the following formula
Where <em>m</em>= mass, <em>g</em>= gravitational acceleration, and <em>h </em>= height.
We know the the mass of the woman is 70 kilograms and the height is 3,940 meters
If we assume this parachute is on Earth, then the gravitational acceleration is 9.8 m/s²
Substitute the values into the formula.
Multiply the first two numbers first.
- 1 kg*m/s² is equal to 1 Newton. Therefore, the first number (686 kg*m/s²) is also equal to 686 Newtons
Multiply again.
- 1 Newton meter is equal to 1 Joule. So, our answer of 2702840 N*m is equal to 2702840 J
The potential energy of the women is<u> 2,702,840 Joules </u>
It would be movement, there are 5 themes of geography:location, place, human/enviroment interaction, movement, and regions.
Answer: Option D -- Resolution to provide reparations and descendants of slaves.
Explanation:
In 2008 and 2009, the United State House of Representatives and Senate adopted some resolutions on historical relationship between the government and African Americans, these resolutions are:
(1) Acknowledgment that past government actions have influenced the current position of African Americans
(2) Acknowledgment of harmful government action against African Americans via Jim Crow laws.
(3) Formal apology for slavery
Answer:
conversion disorder
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that this is an example of conversion disorder. This is a disorder in which an individual person experiences blindness, paralysis, or other symptoms that tend to affect the nervous system and cannot be simply explained by a physical illness or injury. In this case, the physical injuries caused by the associates of the mobster in no way explain Taylor's inability to speak and are therefore categorized as conversion disorder.
1. I believe the primary focus is: To show color outside of white and black by taking photographs of the <span>subjects face. Dass aimed to eliminate the prejudice that we have on which skin color is considered better and bring the audience to see the beauty in the human geniune expression rather than the color alone.
2. Yes, i think it would be considered as a potraits.
A potratis is a picture of an individual. Since the expression shown is part of the individuals themselves, i would argue that the artwork could be conisidered as a ptraits.
3. </span>She says they help us rethink color and the person behind the skin. She wants people to be seen for their heart and personally, she believed that her artworks would help the society to eliminate racism/social prejudices that we imposed to other people simply based on the color of their skin
4. Some of the noticable guidelines that she adhered to were:
- Taking some candid photos in order to show the natural expression from the people in the portrait.
- Making sure that the portraits have clear backgrounds in order to bring the focus to the individuals.
5. I would say that we can learn about the struggles that people in shelters /refugee camp face as the additional lesson from the photos.
With this lesson, the photographers conveys that we should try to get in touch with our humanistic value and make some efforts to help them elevate some of their miseries.
6. The technique would be to <span>Center the subject.
Centering the subject would provide a better frame for the main pictures that the creator wish to dominate the frame.
Doing this would directly focus the attention of the viewer at the subject that we want to bring up the most.
7. This technique is very good for a portrait because </span><span>It minimizes the distraction, and it adds impact to the image.
And often times, this technique would make the audiences aware of the details that they might miss under normal circumstances.
8. When using this technique, the subject eyes should be located </span><span>In a horizontal line and a vertical third line.
This location would most likely provide equal spacing in the top, bottom, left, and right part of the background and would place the face/expression of the portraits as the main focus in the frame.
9. Personally, No.
Using this perspective in the photograph would make face seems to big to be considered as 'aesthetically pleasing'.
On top of that, this perspective also make it difficult to observe the body language of the figure in the portrait.</span>
