Answer: Considering the six criteria that made up an enforceable contract:
(I) Offer and acceptance: There's no clear acceptance between Peter and BIG, because the peter responded with "Most likely", which implies that peter might later decline BIG's offer
(Ii) Mutual agreement : Peter response shows that he didn't understand the terms and conditions that made up the contract, so, there was no agreement between the too.
(Iii) Consideration wasn't been met
(Iv) competent parties: Both parties we're unable to understand the contract, so, they weren't competent
(V) legality of purpose: this also was not met, since there was no clear acceptance
(Vi) proper form: Peter response seems ambiguous, therefore, the contract wasn't enforceable
Well lets see. The Supreme Court ruled that the constitution protected students right to wear black armbands as a sign of protest relating to 8th Circuit Rules Students. (1969) I hope this helps
Answer:
reflective examination (as of one's beliefs or motives) : introspection. 2 : examination of one's body especially for evidence of disease.
Answer:
The answer is aggressive behaviour.
Explanation:
This type of behaviour is characterise by a hostile, often explosive attitude towards others. It has been studied as a symptom to conditions such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and mood disorders like bipolarity.
In order to classify this condition as aggresive behaviour, doctors must rule out any medical and psychiatric disorders.