Race and ethnicity refer to distinct aspects of our identities. The notion that one is a member of a particular cultural, national, or racial group that shares some of the following characteristics is referred to as ethnicity. race, religion, culture, language, or location of origin.
<h3>What definitions do sociologists give to race and ethnicity?</h3>
The term "race" refers to the process of assigning social significance to distinct groups of people based on a variety of physical characteristics. A person's culture, including their language, heritage, religion, and customs, is referred to as their ethnicity.
<h3>What does ethnic identity entail?</h3>
The sense of belonging to a specific ethnic group is measured by ethnic identity. There are many different ways to measure ethnic identity. Simply asking a respondent about his or her ethnic group and identity with the majority group is one way to measure.
To learn more about ethnic identity here
brainly.com/question/29331587
#SPJ1
It increased their power. Have a good day
It is important to recognize our humanity because without humanity, people go back to a more primitive and lawless state. Humanity is important because it helps to control society. Without humanity, people go back to a more primitive and lawless state.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
