Answer:
22.92%
Explanation:
For computing the realized total rate of return, first we have to determine the total share price which is shown below:
Total share price = Sale price of share + dividend end of 2013 + dividend end of 2014 + dividend end of 2015
= $20 + $2.5 + $4 + $3
= $29.50
And, the purchase price is $24
So, the return would be
= Total share price - purchase price
= $29.50 - $24
= $5.50
Now the realized total rate of return would be
= Return ÷ Purchase price
= $5.50 ÷ $24
= 22.92%
This is the answer but the same is not provided in the given options
Answer:
$14,343.25
Explanation:
First city bank pays 8% simple interest in a savings account
Second city bank pays 8% interest compounded annually
$68,000 is deposited deposited in each of the bank
The first step is to calculate the simple interesr per year of first city bank
= principal × rate
= 68,000 × 8/100
= 68,000 × 0.08
= 5,440
The interest earned for the period of 8 years can be calculated as follows.
= 5,440 × 8
= 43,520
The balance at the end of 8 years can be calculated as follows
= 68,000 + 43,520
= 111,520
The next step is to calculate the future value of second city bank
= principal × (1+R)^n
= 68,000 × (1+8%)^8
= 68,000 × (1+0.08)^8
= 68,000 × 1.08^8
= 68,000 × 1.85093021
= 125,863.25
Therefore the amount of money earned from second city bank at the end of 8 years can be calculated as follows
= 125,863.25-111,520
= 14343.25
Hence the money that was earned from second city bank at the end of 8 years is $14,343.25
Answer:
4,000
Explanation:
expected uncollectible 5% of Ar
5% of 100,000 = 5,000
current balance (1,000 credit)
Adjustment 4,000
When the uncolelctibles are made base on account receivable, the amount calculate is the ending balance and we should calculate the adjustment by the diference between beginning balance and ending balance
If the allowance is made based on sales then weshould adjust for the whole amount of the expected bad debt
Answer:
a. rationalization
Explanation:
He justifies his actions stating that he acted in the best interests of the company and nobody stopped him. In the given scenario, Martin is justifying his actions by resorting to rationalization. As we can see that Martin in this scenario is trying to justify his actions which means that he is making excuses to defend himself which is non professional as to avoid the truth from the company.
Answer:
1. low- involvement decisions may sometimes enable consumers to skip steps in the consumer decision making process.
Explanation:
Consumer decision making process includes all the steps between consumer's generation of needs/wants and final purchase of the product.
The process comprises of below mentioned 5 stages:
- Need recognition : whereby a need is generated
- Search for information so as to identify products satisfying such needs
- Evaluation of all available alternatives i.e assessment of all available products satisfying a need and selecting the best alternative.
- Purchases , the stage wherein the consumer buys the selected product.
- Post purchase evaluation, i.e the stage when consumer evaluates whether he made the right purchase decision.
In the given case, the consumer realized that he hadn't eaten at all during the day and thus instantly stopped at a restaurant, made a regular purchase of a burger without caring for the menu or set of other available alternatives.
Here, the investment decision related to a meal, being a low cost decision and occurring in a famished state. So consumers while making such low cost decisions may not find going through the menu and spending much time in deciding as worthwhile and in short will likely skip steps in the consumer decision making process.
