Answer:
Devendra Poudel is minister of education of Nepal.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Power dynamic of Virtuous Friendship best describes their relationship.
Explanation:
Power dynamics is the interaction of people or a group of people with each other in which one party has more power over the other party. This power could outright people of the other party. Power is the ability to influence other to control the other people behavior.
Now in this example, both friends are practicing virtuous friendship; which shows that both friends are selfless and are completely alright with the choice of the other friend, which describes the bonding of both friends is so firm that they value the decisions of each other a lot and will accept it what other friend will do.
Answer:
Preschematic stage
Explanation:
Preschematic stage
Preschematic stage - at this stage of artistic, children at the stage of between 3 year to 4 year, are begin to identify the shape of physical world and ready to draw them.
usually children start from circle and lines that they see around them to start drawing. at this stage of artistic design children start their communication with their drawing.
They invented wheel barrows and farming tools
Answer:
syncretism
Explanation:
Religious syncretism exhibits blending of two or more religious belief systems into a new system, or the incorporation into a religious tradition of beliefs from unrelated traditions. It is contrasted by the idea of multiple religious belonging and polytheism, respectively.
This can occur for many reasons, and the latter scenario happens quite commonly in areas where multiple religious traditions exist in proximity and function actively in the culture, or when a culture is conquered, and the conquerors bring their religious beliefs with them, but do not succeed in entirely eradicating the old beliefs or, especially, practices.
Religions may have syncretic elements to their beliefs or history, but adherents of so-labeled systems often frown on applying the label, especially adherents who belong to "revealed" religious systems, such as the Abrahamic religions, or any system that exhibits an exclusivist approach. Such adherents sometimes see syncretism as a betrayal of their pure truth. By this reasoning, adding an incompatible belief corrupts the original religion, rendering it no longer true. Indeed, critics of a specific syncretistic trend may sometimes use the word "syncretism" as a disparaging epithet, as a charge implying that those who seek to incorporate a new view, belief, or practice into a religious system actually distort the original faith. The consequence, according to Keith Ferdinando, is a fatal compromise of the dominant religion's integrity.[1] Non-exclusivist systems of belief, on the other hand, may feel quite free to incorporate other traditions into their own.