Spanish flu spread rapidly in training camps in Georgia.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
In the late year 1918, several men started showing up in the infirmary with symptoms that indicated towards serious illness. After more and more men came in, days after it was shown the men were ailing from serious Spanish flu. By the time October started, the infirmary which had 5 to 7 people was now flooded with more than 150 people who suffered from the flu. This was the case of Camp Hancock. After a few days, news was received that people were showing up in the infirmary of Camp Gordon, having the same symptoms that were shown by people in Hancock.
On October 5, an estimated number of 3,000 or so people were quarantined at Camp Hancock. Till then, near by cities were already effected by the virus. The outbreak was serious and caused the death of about 50 soldiers. Above that, many men had contradicted pneumonia as well.
Well the short answer is, unlike the christians who would force conversions, the muslims were very tolerant of other conquered peoples and allowed them to continue practicing their beliefs as long as they paid a tax
Answer:
Issue one: The government should not have the right to issue a higher tax on carbonated drinks/soda to discourage teen obesity because it would be not alter the demand for these types of products. Say for example we use the supply, demand, quantity and price model, supply and quantity are unaffected in this model, whilst price goes up. When the price goes up, this would be an example of where demand does not decrease since the price would not deter people from purchasing it. With the amount of sodas that have to be regulated and how common they are to the everyday life, it'd be a waste of time. Furthermore, it is not the responsibility of the government to regulate personal choices done by the customers, it is their own choice if they choose to be healthy or not.
Issue two: The government does not have the right to monitor our actions on the internet to keep the nation safe from terrorism. The internet is a free market, a public entity supplied by public cooperations and access given by ISPs. The government's jurisdiction does not give them permission to monitor the internet as it could possibly fall under a violation of the fourth amendment. The ISPs, social media networks, and any other cooperation has the right to monitor actions as it'd be written out and agreed by the user in their terms of service, the government should not have involvement, only their intervention is required when a report is filed.
Issue three: The government should be allowed to outlaw texting while driving since it is a hazard to personal safety and the safety of others. The roads in the United States of America are mostly public, and texting while driving impairs the user's ability to react to incoming situations, whilst taking their focus off the road. Similar to drinking while driving, it only becomes an issue when the safety of others aside from your self is put at risk. In which case, I do believe the government has the right to outlaw texting while driving to keep drivers safer on the road.
Explanation:
<span>Financial literacy refers to the set of skills and knowledge that allows an individual to make informed and effective decisions with all of their financial resources.</span>
The major guideline that is suggested or used for fielding questions is to pause before answering a question.
<h3>What do you mean by a guideline?</h3>
A guideline refers to a general rule, principle, or piece of advice.
A speaker who allows a question and answer period take a risk as audience members may ask difficult questions.
The major guideline that is suggested for fielding questions is to pause before answering a question.
Therefore, A is the correct option.
Learn more about guidelines here:
brainly.com/question/942630
#SPJ1