The best answer is safety I am 100% sure
The answer to the question is c
Answer:
Don't look at this. I just want points
Explanation:
So lets say the answer is b
Answer:
D). The reality that all anthropological inquiry is a form of interpretation.
Explanation:
As per the question, the key facet of writing ethnography that is demonstrated here would be 'the reality that all anthropological inquiry is a form of interpretation'. Every anthropological inquiry is a kind of interpretation is illustrated as the information is gathered with primary aim to select the group of people whose culture is going to be highlighted and selection of the facts that support a specific deduction or interpretation in order to validate a point(regarding a specific culture) that could be published. Therefore, the 'inquiry aspect of ethnography' is demonstrated here.
Determinism is sometimes confused with fatalism. The difference is that determinism relies more on cause and effect when it comes to free will negation, while fatalism often claims that there is a predetermined destiny that is bound to happen regardless of us.
It is a theory <span>that all human action is caused entirely by preceding events, and not by the exercise of the free will. In determinism, there is no free will because events happen because of previous events that happened. There is nothing that can influence that.
Compatibilism is often criticized as being just a form of soft determinism because they claim that free will can exist in the domain of determinism. Their critics often point out that compatibilism is very deterministic but that they avoid that term due to linguistic problems and that in essence there is no difference
Compatiblisim defines free will as capable of existing alongside determinism since free will can be found in things that are not metaphysical. If you make daily decisions on what food to eat then there's free will, but metaphysical things lack these.</span>
