How does the bill of rights protect individuals civil liberties

History

2 answers:

Nadya [2.5K]3 years ago

7 0

It defines specific rights that all people are entitled to.

Further Explanation:

Protection of civil liberties as well as protection of civil rights is the most Fundamental political value in the American society.It is defined in civil liberties regarding all the specific rights the people are entitled to. For instance, Bill of rights which is there in the first amendment guarantees the citizens the right to practice whatever religion they wish to follow and government can’t interfere in the freedom of worship of any citizen. This amendment provided liberties to the individuals from the actions of the government.

Majority of people in the United States think that civil rights and liberties as the principals that protects them from the freedoms of all times. During the ratification of the constitution took place, Federalists and Anti Federalists were in opposition to each other and were of a disagreement that how individual liberties and rights are protected under the constitution.

Learn More:

1. How did California differ from the United States in terms of interactions of whites and natives?

brainly.com/question/7248802

2. Which issue did the Supreme Court answer in the case of Duncan v. Louisiana?

brainly.com/question/8891404

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Civil liberties

Subject: Constitution

Keywords: United States, Constitution, Civil Liberties, Rights, Freedoms, Ratification, Federalists, Anti-Federalists,

Vikki [24]3 years ago

4 0

The first alternative is correct (A).

The Bill of Rights represented by the first ten amendments to the US Constitution represents the guarantee of fundamental rights for American citizens. Since the institution of the bill of rights, citizens have had constitutional protection for the right to freedom of expression, religion, private property, legal process in lawsuits, among others. These are achievements of the democratic regime that have been preserved over the years.

You might be interested in

How do you feel about the Three-Fifths Compromise? Was it a wise decision by the framers of the constitution to keep the nation

andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

I think the three-fifths compromise was a poor attempt to delay the inevitable. I think that it would have been better to address slavery sooner. I think it should have been adressed when the constituion and bill of rights were written. I understand that it would have been a divisive issue but if you claim that "All men are created equal" and then turn around and dehuminaze other people than it makes you a hypocrite becuase you cannot just pick and choose who is and who is not considered human.

The three-fifths compromise did not do anything for the rights of the slaves in fact it dehumanized them even more and caused the civil war to start even sooner. If they had at least counted everyone as a human not only would it have possibly delayed the war but there may have been a way to keep the plantation owerners happy by saying they would have to pay anyone who worked for them and could not abuse them. If the slaves were treated as an entire person then they would have gained the population needed for more representation. It would have also helped them get the freedom they desereved and possibly avoid the civil war. It would have also helped the southern economy to have a higher and eventually more educated population. One cause of the civil war was the signfict difference in the economies in the north versus the south.

Explanation:

6 0

4 years ago

Identify the correct capital city of the country highlighted on the map above.

OLga [1]

D Paris is the capital of France !!

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What did King i give the virginia company to start the colony of virginia?

Len [333]

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa