1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nastasia [14]
3 years ago
5

1 - Why is the Necessary and Proper Clause a source of ongoing debate? Congress cannot agree on what the clause entails. The wor

ding of the clause is often undergoing revision. The clause deals with powers that are ambiguous and misinterpreted. The clause establishes reserved rights, which vary from state to state. 2 - Congress checks on the power of the presidency by overriding a presidential reversal or veto. debating the bill in both of the houses. making laws without presidential review. sending the bill back to several committees..
History
2 answers:
mylen [45]3 years ago
8 0
1. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C".
2. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "A". 
Scrat [10]3 years ago
7 0

1 - Why is the Necessary and Proper Clause a source of ongoing debate? The clause deals with powers that are ambiguous and misinterpreted.

The "necessary and proper" clause is included in Article I, Section 8, of the United States Constitution. After enumerating a number of the powers of Congress, including borrowing money, coining money, regulating commerce, etc, Section 8 of Article I closes with by saying Congress shall have power "to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."  That's a quite broad and sweeping statement. Political leaders have differed in how they would interpret and apply that sort of authority.

2 - Congress checks on the power of the presidency by: overriding a presidential reversal or veto.

A case in point in history would be the War Powers Act of 1973. The War Powers Act gave Congress (the legislative branch) power over whether to continue fighting a war. Congress had pursued such a resolution after President Nixon had ordered bombings in Cambodia during the Vietnam War, without ever consulting Congress or the American people. Nixon vetoed the War Powers resolution, but Congress overrode his veto. Congress asserted that a President cannot commit American forces to military actions abroad without notifying Congress, and limited the time frame a President could keep armed forces deployed without Congressional approval.

You might be interested in
Why was it important that civil service positions were not hereditary?
Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

<em>The</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>A</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>so</em><em> </em><em>officials</em><em> </em><em>would</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>well-qualified</em><em> </em>

6 0
3 years ago
How did Desmond Tutu help the movement against apartheid?
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]
He emphasized nonviolent protest and encouraged the application of economic pressure on South Africa. He headed the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which was intended to help heal the country by investigating human rights violations that had occurred during the apartheid era.....
8 0
2 years ago
How was whiskey rebellion different from shay's rebellion?
mrs_skeptik [129]

Difference between Shays' and Whiskey: Shays' rebellion was under the Articles of Confederation and the weak government and was unable to support, with force, the state of MA in order to aid in the defeat of the rebellion. The Whiskey Rebellion, under the Constitution, it became evident that the government was capable of enforcing the law.

6 0
3 years ago
What term best describes the type of warfare during World War I?
vredina [299]
The answer is <span>C. Trench warfare .
they were most of the time in trenches.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What type of government would you like to live in and why?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statements are supported by the Dynasty Timeline?
    9·1 answer
  • In 1775 what was the largest city and what was its population
    14·2 answers
  • Slave religion: died out by the early 1820s because of strong opposition from whites. existed without approval from masters, who
    12·1 answer
  • What choice describe some of the difficulties John Adams faced as president
    12·1 answer
  • What were some issues that the newly formed United States faced right after it's formation? What government did the founders cre
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP FAST 40 POINTS
    13·1 answer
  • Why did Stalin reorganise farming in the USSR?
    9·2 answers
  • What do you call an object that travels through the Earth’s atmosphere to strike the Earth causing a small crate to form?
    7·1 answer
  • By the 1840s and 1850s, which southern state had the most miles of railroad track?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!