1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxMikexx [17]
3 years ago
15

How did the Chavin display their gods?

History
1 answer:
dmitriy555 [2]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

its c

Explanation:

in the lesson there was a picture of a sculpture of one of their "gods" and the

guy said it was stone

soooooooo the answer is c

You might be interested in
How did Abraham Lincoln view the issue of southern secession?
kodGreya [7K]
The answer is C plz make be the brainlist answer
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the backbone of the United States government 
NikAS [45]

Answer:

The Constitution

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
In your opinion, should civil and criminal cases require the same amount of proof? Why?
olchik [2.2K]
<span>Crimes are considered offenses against the state, or society as a whole. That means that even though one person might murder another person, murder itself is considered an offense to everyone in society. Accordingly, crimes against the state are prosecuted by the state, and the prosecutor (not the victim) files the case in court as a representative of the state. If it were a civil case, then the wronged party would file the case.Criminal offenses and civil offenses are generally different in terms of their punishment. Criminal cases will have jail time as a potential punishment, whereas civil cases generally only result in monetary damages or orders to do or not do something. Note that a criminal case may involve both jail time and monetary punishments in the form of fines.The standard of proof is also very different in a criminal case versus a civil case. Crimes must generally be proved "beyond a reasonable doubt", whereas civil cases are proved by lower standards of proof such as "the preponderance of the evidence" (which essentially means that it was more likely than not that something occurred in a certain way). The difference in standards exists because civil liability is considered less blameworthy and because the punishments are less severe.Criminal cases almost always allow for a trial by jury. Civil cases do allow juries in some instances, but many civil cases will be decided by a judge.A defendant in a criminal case is entitled to an attorney, and if he or she can't afford one, the state must provide an attorney. A defendant in a civil case is not given an attorney and must pay for one, or else defend him or herself.The protections afforded to defendants under criminal law are considerable (such as the protection against illegal searches and seizures under the 4th Amendment). Many of these well known protections are not available to a defendant in a civil case.</span>

 

In general, because criminal cases have greater consequences - the possibility of jail and even death - criminal cases have many more protections in place and are harder to prove.

The Same Conduct Can Produce Civil and Criminal Liability

Although criminal and civil cases are treated very differently, many people often fail to recognize that the same conduct can result in both criminal and civil liability. Perhaps one of the most famous examples of this is the OJ Simpson trial. The same conduct led to a murder trial (criminal) and a wrongful death trial (civil). In part because of the different standards of proof, there was not enough evidence for a jury to decide that OJ Simpson was guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" in the criminal murder case. In the civil trial, however, the jury found enough evidence to conclude that OJ Simpson wrongfully caused his wife's death by a "preponderance of the evidence".

6 0
3 years ago
40Points
Montano1993 [528]

Answer:to disarm the nation

To teach the population about democracy

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the long term effects of imperialism on the colonized peoples
Anna71 [15]

Answer:

Political, economic, and cultural changes

Explanation:

Imperialism believes that they must dominate another land (and people) by forcing their political, economic, and cultural beliefs on them. Typically this involves making the new colonies change their religious beliefs as well.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When the Mongols were in power what was their attitude towards other religions
    5·1 answer
  • How did the foreign policy of Barack Obama differ from the foreign policy of John F. Kennedy?
    5·1 answer
  • Many Progressives saw the need to regulate businesses in order to preserve?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did southern delegates at the Democratic convention cause so much trouble?
    15·1 answer
  • What was a direct result of the distribution of goods in Africa
    7·1 answer
  • At the constitutional convention in 1787, which topic was common to the Virginia Plan, the New Jersey plan, and the three fifths
    10·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    5·1 answer
  • ____ 1. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand caused a conflict between which two countries (that led to WWI)?
    8·2 answers
  • ¿Cuál de estos hombres era sincero en su conversión? ¿Por qué? <br> es de religion ayuda
    6·1 answer
  • Please help! I can't find the answer anywhere!
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!