Answer:
Answer for the question:
Assume an organization's current service level on order fill is as follows:
Current order fill 80%
Number of orders per year 5,000
Percent of unfilled orders back-ordered 70%
Percent of unfilled orders cancelled 30%
Back order costs per order $150
Lost pretax profit per cancelled order $12,500
a) What is the lost cash flow to the seller at this 80 percent service level?
b) What would be the resulting increase in cash flow if the seller improved order fill to 92 percent
c) If the seller invested $2 million to produce this increased service level, would the investment be justified financially?
d) What is the role of activity-based costing in customer relationship management? In customer segmentation?
is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
Noland's problem was most likely due to PROACTIVE INTERFERENCE.
Proactive interference refers to the tendency of previously learned material to hinder subsequent learning. Proactive interference mostly occur when two information that are similar in format are involved.<span />
Answer:
true the investors expect to earn on those funds
Answer:
The correct answer is C.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Fixed manufacturing overhead cost of $497,000, variable manufacturing overhead of $2.40 per direct labor-hour, and 70,000 direct labor-hours.
T 498:
Total direct labor-hours 80
First, we need to calculate the estimated manufacturing overhead rate for the period:
Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= (497,000/70,000) + 2.4= $9.5 per direct labor hour.
Now we can allocate the overhead to Job 498:
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base
Allocated MOH= 9.5*80= $760