Answer:
a, Redistribute income from Victoria to Fredrick.
Explanation:
Marginal Utility is defined as the "change in the utility from an increase in the consumption of that good or service." According to my research on marginal utility, I can say that based on the information provided within the question we should Redistribute income from Victoria to Fredrick in order to maximize the combined total utility.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The question is incomplete. Here is the complete question
Suppose the demand for Digital Video Recorders (DVRs) is given by Q = 250 - .25p + 4pc, where Q is the quantity of DVRs demanded (in 1000s), p is the price of a DVR, and pc is the price of cable television. How much does the quantity demanded for DVRs change if the p rises by $40? A) drops by 10,000 DVRs B) increases by 16,000 DVRs C) drops by 2,500 DVRs D) increases by 4,000
Answer:
Drops by 10,000 DVRs
Explanation:
The demand for digital video recorders is expressed by
Q= 250- .25p+4pc
Where
Q represents the quantity demanded by the customers
P represents the price of DVR
pc represents the price of cable television
Since the factor of p in the expression above is negative, this implies that the quantity of DVR demanded in the market will reduce
If the price of DVR increase by $40, then the quantity demanded will reduce by
= 0.25×40×1000
= 10×1000
= 10,000 units
Hence the quantity of DVRs drops by 10,000 DVRs if the price is increased to $40
Answer:
2
Explanation:
As a result of the weather, the demand for chocolate increases. the demand curve shifts to the right. there is an increase in equilibrium price and quantity
As a result of the channels closing, the supply of imported cocoa falls. As a result, supply decreases. the supply curve shifts to the left
I believe this answer is true.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
I believe that the main thing here that can favor my company is if there's documentation for every process involved with my dealings with Regina Fabrics.
This could have been solved if she didn't reject the cash that was offered to her company after two months, so there should be a formal documents that shows that she rejected the cash which should be acknowledged and signed by her. Also, the monthly payments received by her should be documented as well.
With regards to the above, if there is a formal documentation in place, then I won't have to pay as the guaranty but if this isn't in place, then I may have to pay since there won't be evidences against her.