Answer:
bar graph
Explanation:
a graph that uses vertical or horizontal bars to display data
Answer:
Total Assets=$18,170 Networth=Assets-Liabilites=$15,855
Total Liabilties=$2,315 Cash Outflows =$3,925
Cash Inflows=$0
Explanation:
Total Assets
Checking Account 450.00
Savings Account 1,890.00
Automobile 7,800.00
Loan payment (80.00)
Household Possession 3,400.00
Stereo Equipment 2,350.00
Computer 1,500.00
Stock Investment 860.00
18,170.00
Total Liabilties
Loan 2,160.00
Credit balance 235.00
Loan payment (80.00)
2,315.00
Networth=$18,170-$2.315=$15,855
Cash Outflows
Rent 650.00
Salaries 1,950.00
Food 450.00
telephone 65.00
Insurance 230.00
Electricity 90.00
Lunch/Parking 180.00
Donation 70.00
Purchase 110.00
Restaurant Spending 130.00
3,925.00
Cash Inflows=$0
<span>A. </span>True. Based on the history of marijuana and other cannabis products, Marijuana was the number-one
cash crop in the united states prior to 1890. Marijuana is a depressant and does not contain nicotine. It is a schedule I controlled substance,
according to U.S. federal regulations where there is approximately 77%
of illicit drug users smoke marijuana. The use of marijuana for medicinal
purposes is illegal in the U.S but legal in Canada. The "reverse
tolerance" turns out to be due to variations in the manner in which the drug is ingested is one of the long-term effect of
Marijuana.
Answer:
The correct answer is d. Use of analytics and techniques which connect multiple processes associated with employee development and career management.
Explanation:
Integrated talent management is basically a process of continuous improvement, in this case of the marketing team. Employees enter a career plan where the company offers all the guarantees so that their performance in their functions is better and better, for this it is necessary to implement a policy that defines the way in which the strategy will be addressed, communicating it to all old and new employees so that they are aware of the growth processes and the different possibilities offered.
Answer:
Answer for the question
Some observers had argued that Uber’s greatest problem was not any of its scandals, but its CEO Travis Kalanick. Now that Kalanick no longer serves that role, how much better off is Uber really? Where do you come down? Do you think Kalanick’s reduced profile will turn the tide for Uber? Or is Kalanick’s drive and competitiveness necessary to Uber’s continued success, regardless of the title he holds? If you were on the board, what would you recommend? And why?
Is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
