<span>Tatiana's sister and brother-in-law visit "Paul" at the milles collines. because of the danger, they want to leave "Rwanda" and take "Tatiana" and the children with them. they feel paul is in no danger because he is a "Hutu", while they, tatiana, and the children are "Tutsi". paul says there is no danger as the "United Nations" and the "world press" are watching. later, paul is driving home and hears gunfire, shouting and glass breaking. buildings are burning. when he arrives, his family and "neighbors" are hiding in the dark. there are no "lights" on. they say there is a "rumor" that "President Habyarimana" has been "murdered", and "Tutsi rebels" have killed him. paul says this is "nonsense".</span>
Answer:
Ecological Validity
Explanation:
According to my research on different research methodology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this study is lacking in Ecological Validity. This refers to to the extent to which the findings of a research study are able to be generalized to real-life settings. This is because like mentioned in the question this study is addressing a situation that does not happen in everyday life therefore it cannot be generalized to a real-life settings.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
C) Walter Mischel
Explanation:
Wanda is very quiet around people in authority,but she can be loud and boisterous among her peers. Walter Mischel would explain the difference in Wanda's behaviour in terms of situational factors.
A person walking because there moving which is mechanical energy.
