The proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given below:
<h3>Scenario 1</h3>
He would say that the pricing system should remain the main determinant of the market and the interference of the government was uncalled for.
<h3>Scenario 2</h3>
He would side with the free market system and be an opponent of the law that frowns on importation.
<h3>Scenario 3</h3>
He would support the suspension of the antitrust laws.
<h3>Scenario 4</h3>
He would believe that markets should not be regulated and the free market system should continue.
<h3>Who is Adam Smith?</h3>
He is the father of modern economics for his work in pioneering ideas such as free trade and the gross domestic product
Hence, we can see that the proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given above.
Read more about Adam Smith here:
brainly.com/question/50
#SPJ1
Answer: A.exceed units sold
Explanation:
In Absorption Costing, All costs be it Fixed or Variable that are directly related to production are considered when computing the Cost of Production.
Under Variable Costs however, only variable Costs are considered for the computing of Cost of Production.
This difference in consideration of costs under each method leads to difference in income determination under each method.
Under Absorption Costing, fixed manufacturing costs are apportioned on produced units and the costs are only recovered when the units are sold but under variable costing, fixed manufacturing costs are treated as period costs and are therefore charged to the Income statement.
This means that, the amount of income under absorption costing will be more than the amount of income under variable costing when units manufactured exceed units sold.
Based on the information given the current ratio is:1.4.
<h3>Current ratio</h3>
Using this formula
Current ratio=Current assets/Current liabilites
Where:
Current assets=$191,800
Current liabilities=$137,000
Let plug in the formula
Current ratio=$191,800/$137,000
Current ratio = 1.4
Inconclusion the current ratio is:1.4.
Learn more about current ratio here:brainly.com/question/2686492
Answer:
"at-will" simply means the employer can let you go without cause
Explanation:
At-will means that an employer can terminate an employee at any time for any reason, except an illegal one, or for no reason without incurring legal liability. Likewise, an employee is free to leave a job at any time for any or no reason with no adverse legal consequences.
Financial de-regulation from the Reagan Administration in the 80's had the largest impact on the financial crisis of 2008.
