<span>the Missouri compromise </span>
Answer:
D. It might be hard for voters to really tell which candidates are truly of the "natural aristocracy."
Explanation:
The system of democracy which asserts that the best and brightest citizens (individuals of natural aristocracy) would provided proper representation is criticized because It might be hard for voters to really tell which candidates are truly of the "natural aristocracy." In a population of over 300 million people, it will be hard for the average American voter to identify individuals who are of natural aristocracy, who broke the norm and standout among their peers as such individuals may be confused by those of artificial aristocracy who have the finance, family name and obtained polished education.
Answer:
1. The fact that a times most people tends to be obviously unethical without any reasonable explanations to back up their inactivity.
2. I did not agree with the idea of generality in the question which obviously points out that everybody is unethical to some extent which might be false because even at the course of generality, there most be an exception.
Explanation:
To be unethical means to be unable to conform to the given standards or rules of an organization professionally.
A main difference between the United States Constitution and state constitutions are that state constitutions are subservient to the U.S. Constitution and can only outline powers which are allowed to states by the U.S. Constitution. States cannot enumerate for itself powers that are not allowed to the state by the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, the U.S. Constitution is the highest law of the land and cannot be changed or adapted as a result of a state constitution.
