Favoring the interests of native-born people over foreign-born people or immigrants is called nativism.
Nativism is defined as the political policy that promotes the interests of native inhabitants compared to those of foreign-born people or immigrants. Nevertheless, immigration restriction position is currently its most common description.
Some people think nativism is a negative term and they prefer to call themselves patriots.
How far would you let the government go in examining people's private lives depends on the situation at hand. When it comes to sexual incidents and murder allegations, I think it's appropriate for states to share their crime databases. These are cases that the public should be aware of because it's not every time someone walks out or gets paroled for something and never commits that crime again.
As for other crimes, I see no reason to share this. It can cause problems for the person's self-development. I also think it crosses the line of abusing power to access this information. The concept of trading privacy for security makes sense when used for legitimate purposes, but it's always gone too far and distorts your view of what it means to trade privacy for security.
Know more about privacy here
brainly.com/question/1145825
#SPJ4
Answer:
mining
Explanation:
Once a mineral deposit has been found it has to be extracted from the ground to access the valuable minerals it contains. This can be done by opencast quarrying or underground mining. Certain minerals can also be extracted by pumping.
It was a vital commercial and military trail.
Answer:
because ''we the people'' tried to encroach their land and we began to kill them mercilessly,so they have their venegance
Explanation: