Explanation:
It gave them financial aid and paid them to work less; in order to do this, the government raised the farmers' crop prices. ... It allowed for unions to converse and be protected from previous acts or abuses from the government or bosses.
I trust “<u>Source 1</u>”
<u>Explanation</u>:
I would trust the Source 1 i.e., the “Sworn testimony by American Sergeant in Congressional hearings in 1969” more because a sworn testimony is a gold evidence for the Congressional hearings. It won’t affect a person i.e., the Sergeant in any way. Maybe the testimony can get corrupted by lying, forcing and constraining, and the shaking the human memory. But in a speech by the General can affect his reputation as he can hid the truth and lie in his speech. So, the sworn testimony is more reliable than the speech.
Can you clarify the question here?
Through laws that guaranteed them equal access to education
