Answer:
Explanation:
He compares the role of a supreme court justice to that of an umpire in baseball or a referee in football or hockey.
He says for example, that those neutrals would never favor a team for person reasons. A team would never get unfair treatment if they were in a do or die match and had not been in such a match for 50 or more years while their opponents had one this match multiple times. Such behavior would be unthinkable.
He stated that one must uphold the rules as given to him. The idea of a referee or umpire falls apart a little here, but a supreme court justice is not obligated to uphold rules which are unconstitutional. His job is to fairly judge what should be decided. It does not matter what his own thoughts on abortion might be: he must rule on what the constitution would say about such matters.
Sometimes it is not always easy.
Answer:
compassionate because you are doing something that makes you feel good inside and you get the urge that you have to do it for someone else
<h3><u>
Answer:</u></h3>
During the study discussed the passage, different sized circles were displayed before the shock was delivered to the participants. The shock and resulting fear are examples of unconditioned stimulus and an unconditioned response.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
Shock happens with insufficient blood flow. It can lead to anxiety or weakness. It happens suddenly when there is sudden change very nearer to us and it is difficult to understand or accept. When the mind cannot suddenly accept such a thing and analyze, the person goes in shock.
It is not in control of the human mind or heart. So it an unconditioned stimulus. When a person goes in shock there are various changes in the body. Fear a consequence of going in shock. The fear in a person's mind is natural and comes automatically when the person is in shock. so it is an unconditioned response.
