Answer:
These Juries were capable of coming to two such verdict because, a criminal jury's burden of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt" and a civil jury's burden of proof is "preponderance of the evidence."
A criminal's jury burden of proof being beyond a reasonable doubt means that the legal standard for deciding the outcome of a criminal charge, requires evidence that is sufficient to eliminate any doubts that a reasonable person might entertain about whether a claim is more likely to be true than not.
A civil jury burden of proof being preponderance of the evidence means that the legal standard applied for deciding the outcome of civil disputes, requires that evidence be sufficient to determine that a claim is more likely to be true than not.
Answer:
D: They were fearfull when he refused to disband his army
Answer:
social loafing
Explanation:
Social loafing: In psychology, the term "social loafing" is defined as a process in which an individual generally exert very fewer efforts while doing a particular task if he or she is being surrounded with other people as well as when he or she is a specific group as a member of that group rather when he or she is working alone. The idea behind working in a specific group is to enhance an individual's skills or to get improved accomplishment related to a specific task by enriching the talents and skills of the different members of the group.
In the question above, the given statement is called social loafing.
Answer:
Human agency.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, the human agency is the notion that students that students have the capacity to exercise influences over their life events and coordinate their own learning, motivation, and emotions. It's the belief that one has the power to control his-her life; be it emotions or learning.
