1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelechka [254]
3 years ago
13

"The Issue is the future of southeast Asia as a whole. A threat to any nation in the region is a threat to all, and a threat to

us..."
I don't know how I am supposed to explain this as it gives little information.

Can anybody help me?
History
1 answer:
Black_prince [1.1K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: The Tonkin Gulf Incident, 1964

Explanation: President Johnson's Message to Congress August 5, 1964

The previous evening I reported to the American individuals that the North Vietnamese system had led further purposeful assaults against U.S. maritime vessels working in worldwide waters, and I had thusly coordinated air activity against gunboats and supporting offices utilized in these unfriendly tasks. This air activity has now been done with generous harm to the vessels and offices. Two U.S. airplane were lost in the activity.

After interview with the pioneers of the two players in the Congress, I further reported a choice to approach the Congress for a goal communicating the solidarity and assurance of the United States in supporting opportunity and in ensuring harmony in southeast Asia.

These most recent activities of the North Vietnamese system has given another and grave go to the effectively difficult circumstance in southeast Asia. Our responsibilities around there are notable to the Congress. They were originally made in 1954 by President Eisenhower. They were additionally characterized in the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty endorsed by the Senate in February 1955.

This bargain with its going with convention commits the United States and different individuals to act as per their sacred procedures to meet Communist animosity against any of the gatherings or convention states.

Our approach in southeast Asia has been predictable and unaltered since 1954. I summed up it on June 2 out of four basic suggestions:

America keeps her assertion. Here as somewhere else, we should and will respect our responsibilities.

The issue is the eventual fate of southeast Asia all in all. A danger to any country in that locale is a danger to all, and a danger to us.

Our motivation is harmony. We have no military, political, or regional desire in the zone.

This isn't only a wilderness war, yet a battle for opportunity on each front of human movement. Our military and monetary help to South Vietnam and Laos specifically has the motivation behind helping these nations to repulse animosity and fortify their autonomy.

The danger to the free countries of southeast Asia has for some time been clear. The North Vietnamese system has continually looked to assume control over South Vietnam and Laos. This Communist system has abused the Geneva concurs for Vietnam. It has methodicallly led a battle of disruption, which incorporates the course, preparing, and gracefully of work force and arms for the lead of guerrilla fighting in A south Vietnamese area. In Laos, the North Vietnamese system has kept up military powers, an utilized Laotian area for penetration into South Vietnam, and most as of late completed battle tasks - all in direct infringement of the Geneva Agreements of 1962.

As of late, the activities of the North Vietnamese system have gotten consistently all the more undermining...

As President of the United States I have inferred that I should now ask the Congress, on its part, to join in insisting the national assurance that every such assault will be met, and that the United States will proceed in its essential arrangement of helping the free countries of the region to guard their opportunity.

As I have more than once clarified, the United States plans no carelessness, and looks for no more extensive war. We should make it understood to all that the United States is joined in its assurance to realize the finish of Communist disruption and hostility in the region. We look for the full and compelling reclamation of the worldwide understandings marked in Geneva in 1954, concerning South Vietnam, and again in Geneva in 1962, as for Laos.

You might be interested in
(MUSIC STUDENTS HELP!) I NEED SOMEONE TO JOT DOWN OR ADD ON THE NOTES (LIKE THE LETTER EACH NOTE MEANS). URGET!! So I just someo
patriot [66]

Answer:

attached as image.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a polis? We don't just get political science from that term, we also have cities with that suffix on it here in America.
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

Polis is a state or region in ancient Greece, The administrative or religious city center, as distinct from the rest of the city.

  1. Persepolis
  2. Heliopolis

<em>hope it helps!</em>

8 0
3 years ago
How was the disagreement between the United States and the Soviet Union about the Cuban Missile Crisis finally resolved?
brilliants [131]
On this day in History, The Cuban Missile Crisis comes to an end on Oct 28, 1962. The United States and the Soviet Union that came close to provoking a nuclear conflict. Relations between Cuba and the Soviet Union were on shaky ground. The Cuban Missile Crisis comes to an end. The Cuban Missile crisis comes to a close as Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev agrees to remove Russian missiles from Cuba in exchange for a promise from the United States to respect Cuba’s territorial sovereignty. This ended nearly two weeks of anxiety and tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union that came close to provoking a nuclear conflict. The consequences of the crisis were many and varied. Relations between Cuba and the Soviet Union were on shaky ground for some time after Khrushchev’s removal of the missiles, as Fidel Castro accused the Russians of backing down from the Americans and deserting the Cuban revolution. European allies of the United States were also angered, not because of the U.S. stance during the crisis, but because the Kennedy administration kept them virtually in the dark about negotiations that might have led to an atomic war. Inside the Soviet Union, hardened for less than a year after the crisis ended the United States and Soviet Union.
~Mr. Sanders
11th Grade Social Studies Teacher
5 0
3 years ago
How did zeppelins improve the industry or society?
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

These things killed people

Explanation:

How did zeppelins improve the industry or society?

During their brief, but deadly dominance the airships killed more than 500 people and injured more than a thousand in places all down the east of the country. The last ever attempt to bomb Britain by a Zeppelin was over the Norfolk coast on 5 August 1918.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The ______________________ wanted to restore the ______________ of the Roman Catholic Church.
fredd [130]

Answer:

reformation; original simplicity

Explanation:

i just learned bout this in social studies

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A Christian can be a fatalist.<br><br><br> TrueFalse
    6·1 answer
  • Why did Prescott order his soldiers to slow down or cease their firing of the muskets/rifels
    5·1 answer
  • How do the petition of right and the English bill of rights differ in regard to the military?
    9·1 answer
  • Suppose you were writing a summary of the article. Which of these would not be important to put in the summary? A The Constituti
    15·1 answer
  • Islam was introduced to west Africa by
    9·2 answers
  • 9. Think of modern-day examples that highlight the same motivations for expansion that existed during
    9·1 answer
  • What do laissez-faire economists believe in?
    13·1 answer
  • What did south carolina secede from the union​
    5·2 answers
  • How did the Japanese approach to war compare to the German approac
    7·1 answer
  • Drag each tile to the correct box. Not all descriptions will be used.
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!