1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelechka [254]
3 years ago
13

"The Issue is the future of southeast Asia as a whole. A threat to any nation in the region is a threat to all, and a threat to

us..."
I don't know how I am supposed to explain this as it gives little information.

Can anybody help me?
History
1 answer:
Black_prince [1.1K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: The Tonkin Gulf Incident, 1964

Explanation: President Johnson's Message to Congress August 5, 1964

The previous evening I reported to the American individuals that the North Vietnamese system had led further purposeful assaults against U.S. maritime vessels working in worldwide waters, and I had thusly coordinated air activity against gunboats and supporting offices utilized in these unfriendly tasks. This air activity has now been done with generous harm to the vessels and offices. Two U.S. airplane were lost in the activity.

After interview with the pioneers of the two players in the Congress, I further reported a choice to approach the Congress for a goal communicating the solidarity and assurance of the United States in supporting opportunity and in ensuring harmony in southeast Asia.

These most recent activities of the North Vietnamese system has given another and grave go to the effectively difficult circumstance in southeast Asia. Our responsibilities around there are notable to the Congress. They were originally made in 1954 by President Eisenhower. They were additionally characterized in the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty endorsed by the Senate in February 1955.

This bargain with its going with convention commits the United States and different individuals to act as per their sacred procedures to meet Communist animosity against any of the gatherings or convention states.

Our approach in southeast Asia has been predictable and unaltered since 1954. I summed up it on June 2 out of four basic suggestions:

America keeps her assertion. Here as somewhere else, we should and will respect our responsibilities.

The issue is the eventual fate of southeast Asia all in all. A danger to any country in that locale is a danger to all, and a danger to us.

Our motivation is harmony. We have no military, political, or regional desire in the zone.

This isn't only a wilderness war, yet a battle for opportunity on each front of human movement. Our military and monetary help to South Vietnam and Laos specifically has the motivation behind helping these nations to repulse animosity and fortify their autonomy.

The danger to the free countries of southeast Asia has for some time been clear. The North Vietnamese system has continually looked to assume control over South Vietnam and Laos. This Communist system has abused the Geneva concurs for Vietnam. It has methodicallly led a battle of disruption, which incorporates the course, preparing, and gracefully of work force and arms for the lead of guerrilla fighting in A south Vietnamese area. In Laos, the North Vietnamese system has kept up military powers, an utilized Laotian area for penetration into South Vietnam, and most as of late completed battle tasks - all in direct infringement of the Geneva Agreements of 1962.

As of late, the activities of the North Vietnamese system have gotten consistently all the more undermining...

As President of the United States I have inferred that I should now ask the Congress, on its part, to join in insisting the national assurance that every such assault will be met, and that the United States will proceed in its essential arrangement of helping the free countries of the region to guard their opportunity.

As I have more than once clarified, the United States plans no carelessness, and looks for no more extensive war. We should make it understood to all that the United States is joined in its assurance to realize the finish of Communist disruption and hostility in the region. We look for the full and compelling reclamation of the worldwide understandings marked in Geneva in 1954, concerning South Vietnam, and again in Geneva in 1962, as for Laos.

You might be interested in
The Battle of Midway was significant in World War II because it marked the end of A) the Japanese assault on China. B) the Germa
IRINA_888 [86]
The Battle of Midway was significant because it marked the end of C - the Japanese eastward advance in the Pacifc. By many, the Battle of  Midway seems to have been the decisive victory which ould men needed at the time.  
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor,
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

I think the answer is "Congress declared war against Japan; Germany then declared war on the United States."

<em>I am not sure because its been forever since I have done assignments on this, but hopefully it helps!!! :)</em>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Energy can never be created or destroyed,just___ or___
Alina [70]
Transformed or changed from one form to another.
5 0
3 years ago
Because of the worldwide economic depression following World War I, Germany
JulijaS [17]
Germany.....?

I will tell you a little bit about what happened. At the end of WWI Germany was made to take blame for WWI. Pay reparations. Have their military cut down and weapons were non existent. This is why WWII happened the Allies disabled them so much they got angry and so the rise of Hitler.
4 0
3 years ago
ACTING AS AN AMATEUR HISTORIAN
scoray [572]

Answer: The influence of Byzantium on the countries of Eastern Europe.

Explanation:

Byzantium had a significant influence on the countries of Eastern Europe. This impact has affected all segments of society. In the political sense, the result is reflected in some aspects of the organization of government. The centralized government and strong personality of the rulers are evident in Eastern Europe's rulers as well. In the economic system, certain elements related to taxes were taken over by Eastern European countries, and the method of collecting individual taxes was the same. The most significant influence was in art, architecture, culture, and religion. Many countries took the Cyrillic alphabet from the Byzantines, the architectural style also, and these elements are evident today. After the church schism in 1054, many countries took over Orthodoxy as the official religion from Byzantium.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • All of the following industries flourished in Texas as a result of the oil industry EXCEPT:
    9·2 answers
  • What caused xyz affair to happen
    6·2 answers
  • Who influenced Marc Anthony in his early life
    8·2 answers
  • What peculiar teaching a confusion caused him to be resisted by the aristocrats
    14·1 answer
  • I will give out the brain thing and extra points, image below.
    13·2 answers
  • Which foreign policy served national interests the most, Proclamation Neutrality 1793, Louisiana Purchase 1803, the War of 1812
    8·1 answer
  • Who was Falconbridge?how might his background have influenced what he wrote about the middle passage?
    5·1 answer
  • What did Frederick Douglass and John Brown think of Harriet Tubman? 1. They thought she was a little too little to do any good o
    11·1 answer
  • Who killed hitler, and why isn't there a statue of him?
    6·1 answer
  • Match each tile to the correct box. each person or movement with the problem they critiqued. Ulysses S. Grant Grange movement Th
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!