Prior to Dee leaving home, the everyday objects in her household were just that- everyday objects. She took no special notice of any of them. However, once she returns home, all of these objects represent great culture significance to her. She is incredibly enthused about how great the wooden benches and old quilts are because she thinks it is in-style to be in touch with her own culture.
I think the answer is "In 1867, the United States bought Alaska from Russia for $7 million". When you ask the question "when" the question is asking about time. In this excerpt, when is answered by "in 1987". while the sentence supported it is the event that happened during that time, which is " The US bought Alaska from Russia for $7 million.
The elements of society the story 'The Happy Man' is criticizing are: demands of jobs, death, and politics.
<u>Explanation:</u>
‘The Happy Man’ is a short story written by Naguib Mahfouz which gives its readers a deep message. The author have made use of satire wherein he criticizes some aspects of society by using humor.
This is a story about a man who finds himself extremely happy one morning. As the story moves forward, the author depicts that there’s no such thing as a perfect life or perfect happiness, because happiness is a myth.
Through the example of the happy man, the author criticizes the demands of job that is put to an employees, in the story the happy man works as a writer at local newspaper. Apart from this, the other elements of society are also been criticized which includes death, and the politics.
It's summarizing when a passage is shortening by only focusing in the main points.
In the article "Saudis Expand Regional Power as Others Falter" the author David D Kirkpatrick discusses the associate degree ironic shift from a democracy mentality back to a lucid autarchy comfort. it's believed that this paradigm shift is predicated on 2 distinctive contributors; foremost the "feebleness or near-collapse of the states around them, together with Asian nation, Egypt, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain and Tunisia" and second the perseverance as well as significant funding of the recent Saudi order (Kirkpatrick D).
It is simply an entire<span> mess." For an</span><span> absolute </span>autarchy<span> tracing its </span>family<span> roots back </span>three hundred<span> years, </span>the Asian nation<span> is taking </span>a number one<span> role </span>within the<span> struggle to reshape that mess.</span> The surprising<span> outcome of the Arab Spring, </span>that<span> once stirred hopes for the rule of law and </span>trendy<span> democracy.</span>
<span>The analysts and diplomats say, is that the </span>ascendency<span> of the Saudis </span>is essentially<span> a byproduct of the feebleness or near-collapse of </span>such a lot of<span> the states around them, </span>together with Republic of Iraq<span>, Egypt, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain, and </span>Tunisia.
<span>The Saudis </span>are shoring<span> Bahrain, and </span>are<span> fighting </span>aboard to<span /><span> support </span>the govt.<span> in </span>national capital.
<span>Billions of </span>bucks<span> from Saudi coffers </span>are<span> sustaining friendly governments in Egypt and Jordan.</span>
