Hey there mate!
Based on my information to this, I believe sense (it would be a closed system), this would most likely be considered to be (equal to) the total energy after.
But, if it was not a (closed system), it would not be unrelated because the energetic system would not be that greatly increased.
So, it really depends whether the system closes up, or whether it would be free of energy.
So, in this case, your correct option to this answer would be (option A).
<span>In a closed system, the total energy prior to an energy transformation is unrelated to the total energy after.
I hope this helps you!</span>
There's been a lot of bad news for polar bears recently. In 2007, for example, scientists reported that if global warming continues unabated, the population could drop two-thirds by 2050.
I think it would be in the cells
Answer:
C
Explanation:
There are several cells, therefore it is multicellular. They also have nuclei, meaning that this organism is a <em>multicellular eukaryote.</em>
Answer:
C. They have a greater surface-to-volume ratio.
Explanation:
Because these smaller cells can access and pass through the membranes of the other cell membranes and permeable coverings easily and voluntarily unlike larger cells. It is also efficient for these smaller cells to penetrate and travel, delivering and transporting goods and materials such as nutrients, oxygen and waste throughout the body without consuming enough energy and conserving lesser space.
For simple reasons, they are faster, more efficient and consumes little space, and most especially depletes lesser energy. So, many small cells have more surface area than one large cell.
