1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreev551 [17]
3 years ago
8

Why would a speaker use rhetoric

English
1 answer:
notsponge [240]3 years ago
7 0
A speaker would use rhethoric devices so as to persuade the listeners to accept what he says as the unavoidable truth. This would be done using elements such as Ethos, Logos, and Pathos, as presented by Cicero.
You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP
joja [24]

Any story can be rewritten from the first person to the third person point of view.

<h3>What is the first person point of view?</h3>

The narrator in first-person narration is a character in the tale who tells the story from their own point of view.

The pronoun I is frequently used in the narration (or we, if the narrator is speaking as part of a group).

Hence, when transiting from the first to the third, the personal experiences of the first person who experienced the event may be lost.

Learn more about Third Person Point of view:
brainly.com/question/826893
#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
Which One is NOT.....
konstantin123 [22]
The 1st one, because what does girls, and moms have to do with anything.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Quindlen begins by disagreeing with a fellow writer. How and how fairly does she represent the opposing point of view?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:Quindlen was criticizing the application of standardized testing (perhaps in the wake of the controversial "No Child Left Behind" act which some say placed too much emphasis on standardized testing). Quindlen's argument is that if standardized testing is to be used, it should at least be interesting and more importantly, such testing should not edit works of literature to the point at which significant meaning is lost. Actually, she is arguing that literature should not be edited at all.  

Quindlen doesn't think children are too feeble and weak to read controversial issues because they are exposed to such issues through the media and Internet every day. In fact, by sanitizing (editing out anything remotely controversial) literature, the test will not challenge the student.  

Those who design the test claim that anything controversial might distract the student and affect his/her performance. Quindlen's response is that the kids can handle it and more to the point, if all remotely controversial issues are edited out, what is left can hardly been interesting or engaging. Also, to edit in this way is historically irresponsible. Quindlen notes that in Isaac Singer's excerpt about being a young Jew in prewar (World War II) Poland, all references to Jews and Poles were taken out.  

Quindlen notes that there are other consequences of this editing. One is that the students will determine from this that those designing the test have no faith in their (the students') ability to handle differing perspectives and challenging intellectual material. Quindlen argues that this is sending the message to children that "we don't think you're smart enough."  

But what do the kids learn from this? That the written word doesn't really matter much, that it can be weakened at will. That no one trusts a student to understand that variations in opinion and background are both objectively interesting and intellectually challenging.  

This also tells the student that there is no power to the written word (as literature, laws, etc.) if we can simply edit things that don't appeal to a particular way of thinking. So, clearly Quindlen is against this manipulation of literature, in these tests and in general, for a number of reasons, all logical. This kind of editing also sets a dangerous precedent where those in power of educating children have the ability to subject students to a particular worldview that they only assume is the best for everyone. This is quite audacious and ignores one of the hallmarks of American culture: diversity.

Explanation:

hope you get your thing correct

4 0
3 years ago
Simile- A simile is a figure of speech in which two unlike objects are compared using
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer: flames and long curved fingers

Explanation:

shows that the flames are big and reach across the sky

4 0
3 years ago
A lead that consists of short, snappy phrases that catch the attention of the audience and "set the scene" before providing info
Arturiano [62]

The answer is: A. A narrative lead.

A narrative lead is the opening of the story, the phrases that hook the readers' attention and display the scene before they find out about the characters and the circumastances surrounding them. They can also be created through dialogue, action or imagery. A typical example of a narrative lead is the phrase "Once upon a time."

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Nicole was asked to speak to the French Club about her trip to Northern France. She knew her audience would be made up of high s
    6·1 answer
  • How does max feel While at Loretta's house?
    11·2 answers
  • What distinct quality does the speaker attribute to his beloved’s face in this excerpt from William Shakespeare’s Sonnet 93?
    8·2 answers
  • Identify three of the counterclaims Hardin introduces within his essay.
    13·1 answer
  • Read these two short excerpts from “What I Hope to Leave Behind.” Most women dream first of a happy family. The instinct for rep
    8·2 answers
  • Why was it necessary for the plot for Ivan to be characterized in this way
    9·1 answer
  • Write a paragraph describing how you think you would feel if you were in Okonkwo’s position. What would you do? How would it mak
    11·1 answer
  • In what specific way does the setting
    12·1 answer
  • HELPP!!!!!
    10·2 answers
  • What did the waitress mean when she yelled to the cook.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!