Hello! :)
The sum of the number of dogs and cats.
Cats= 6
Dogs= d
It is asking for the sum. (the number added together)
d+6 or "C" is the correct answer.
~'Manda
The answer to this question is 600-28w > 300. This inequality can be described as $600 (money in the savings account) subtracted by $28w (withdrawal of $28 a week for food) should be greater than $300. It proves that the money will not drop below $300.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
the temperature went down it became colder
it went down 8
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
IQR is the higher qurtile subtracted by the lower qurtile so higher is 40 and lower is 20 so 14
Hope this helps have a great day:)
Answer:
a. Yes. This provides convincing evidence that the true proportion of all attendees who ate the fish that got sick (80%) is more than the true proportion of all attendees who did not eat the fish that got sick.
b. The mistake here would have been the rejection of the Doctor's theory or hypothesis to the effect that more attendees who ate the fish got sick than those who did not eat the fish. This is a Type 1 error. A Type 1 error occurs when a null hypothesis is rejected when it is true. On the other hand, a Type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is accepted when it should be rejected. While a Type I error is equivalent to a false positive, a Type II error is equivalent to a false negative.
Step-by-step explanation:
Total number of attendees who ordered fish = 1,000
Sample size of the attendees who ate fish = 80
Number of attendees who ate the fish and got sick = 64 (80% or 64/80)
Sample size of attendees who did not eat fish = 60
Number of attendees who did not eat fish and got sick = 39 (65% or 39/60)
