1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Troyanec [42]
3 years ago
13

DUE TONIGHT How could the remapping of Texas be applied to example and explain the state's Don't Mess With Texas, age old attitu

de, and individualistic political culture?
Law
1 answer:
svlad2 [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

hi tere you will do great

Explanation:

i love you

You might be interested in
Do you believe we should have mandatory minimums. Why or why not
Kipish [7]

Answer: No

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
1. Should Dudley and Stephens be tried for murder? Explain.
lozanna [386]
YesIt would serve the purpose of enforcing the law in that country which is “any person who deliberately takes the life of another is guilty of murder
6 0
3 years ago
In recent years, the court has granted writs of certiorari to about what percentage of petitioners?
valentina_108 [34]

The court granted writs of certiorari to more than 10,000 petitioners in U.S.

The latin word "certiorari" means to make something more certain.

Writs of certiorari is a maxim in law which order the lower court to send its records on a case to the Supreme Court for review.

In recent years, for more than 5,910 petitions on Writ of Certiorari filed to the Supreme Court, there were only granted cert for only 165 cases, thus, making the practice have a success rate of only 2.8%.

In conclusion, the court granted writs of certiorari to more than 10,000 petitioners in U.S.

Read more about Writs of certiorari

<em>brainly.com/question/11478804</em>

5 0
2 years ago
Child Abuse is going on in Youth Football, Police said they will take charge, period
Stella [2.4K]
Yes. they will take charge because they are police and that is a crime. Please mark brainliest
3 0
3 years ago
What are the two perspectives regarding the power of line-item veto?<br> Explain please!
olasank [31]

Congress attempted to grant this power to the president by the Line Item Veto Act of 1996.

<u> Explanation: </u>

The congress of the United States of America has granted certain powers to the president to nullify the part of the bill and that is called line item veto. This can also be termed as partial veto.

The line item veto will give powers to the president to cancel certain provision in the bill and namely budget appropriation bill without vetoing the entire legislative bill.

Supreme Court of America as ruled that it is unconstitutional and it stated that Line Item Veto Act of 1996 has violated the fundamental principle of the presidential clause of the constitution.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • HURRY ITS A QUIZ!!!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • Increased visibility can be achieved by allowing cyclists to merge with regular traffic...
    10·1 answer
  • Why are wealthy people essential in the economy?
    13·2 answers
  • What might a national fingerprint database not meet current law enforcement needs and be considered outdated?
    5·1 answer
  • After reading the following passage which of the following conclusions can most accurately be drawn about the development of law
    14·1 answer
  • When threats are used to convince a party to sign a contract, it is known as
    9·1 answer
  • Plssssssssssssssssss help
    8·2 answers
  • A. With both vehicles approaching a stop sign, which vehicle has the right of way at this intersection?
    15·1 answer
  • The work of a group that regulates relations between various criminal enterprises involved in the smuggling and sale of drugs, p
    12·1 answer
  • What area does the airport equipment use to go between gates and other areas of the airport?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!