Jeremy says that 5.676677666777... is a rational number because it is a decimal that goes in forever with a pattern. Is he corre
1 answer:
Answer: Jeremy is not correct as the decimal has no pattern.
Step-by-step explanation:
- A decimal number that is repeating is a rational number as it can be written as
, where
.
For example : 3.56555...., 4.454545....
Given: Jeremy says that 5.676677666777...
Here the number has no repeated pattern as we can see after the decimal (first 67 then 6677 then 666777).
That means it is not rational.
So, Jeremy is not correct as the decimal has no pattern.
You might be interested in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Solving (9): The equation of the table
We start by calculating the slope (m)
Where:
The equation is then calculated using:
So, we have:
Open bracket
Solving (10):
Required
Find x
Divide both sides by 4.8
Answer:
0.333 units³
Step-by-step explanation:
Think process:
The equation is given as y =
Let, y = f (x)
Therefore,
We know that the limits are y-axis and x= 3
Y-axis: x= 0
then limits are given as x= 0 and x = 3
Integrating gives:
=
+ C
calculating from x= 0 to x = 3, we know volume is given by
= [
]
= [0.000041136 + 1/3]
= 0.333 units³