Answer:
Market price $400
Cost price $300
Step-by-step explanation:
MP: market price
CP: cost price
1. (MP x 0.9) - CP = 60
CP = 0.9MP - 60
2. MP - CP = 100
CP = MP - 100
0.9MP - 60 = MP - 100
MP - 0.9MP = 100 - 60
0.1MP = 40
MP = 400
Cost price = MP - 100 = 400 - 100 = 300
Binomial distribution formula: P(x) = (n k) p^k * (1 - p)^n - k
a) Probability that four parts are defective = 0.01374
P(4 defective) = (25 4) (0.04)^4 * (0.96)^21
P(4 defective) = 0.01374
b) Probability that at least one part is defective = 0.6396
Find the probability that 0 parts are defective and subtract that probability from 1.
P(0 defective) = (25 0) (0.04)^0 * (0.96)^25
P(0 defective) = 0.3604
1 - 0.3604 = 0.6396
c) Probability that 25 parts are defective = approximately 0
P(25 defective) = (25 25) (0.04)^25 * (0.96)^0
P(25 defective) = approximately 0
d) Probability that at most 1 part is defective = 0.7358
Find the probability that 0 and 1 parts are defective and add them together.
P(0 defective) = 0.3604 (from above)
P(1 defective) = (25 1) (0.04)^1 * (0.96)^24
P(1 defective) = 0.3754
P(at most 1 defective) = 0.3604 + 0.3754 = 0.7358
e) Mean = 1 | Standard Deviation = 0.9798
mean = n * p
mean = 25 * 0.04 = 1
stdev = 
stdev =
= 0.9798
Hope this helps!! :)
Answer:
x^2 + 8x + 16
Step-by-step explanation:
(x + 4) (x+ 4) multiply x by x and x by 4.
x^2 + 4x
Then multiply 4 by x and 4 by 4.
4x + 16
Then combine like terms.
x^2 + 4x + 4x +16
x^2 + 8x + 16
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
This scenario can be modeled using an exponential growth equation.
The exponential growth equations have the following form:

Where P is the population in year t
p is the initial population at t = 0
r is the growth rate
t is the time in years.
In this case we know that the current population is 13,000 and that the growth rate is 11%
So

The equation that models this scenario is:


Answer: None
Step-by-step explanation:
If A=4, say for example, our list becomes: 3/4, 4/5, 75%.
This in decimal form becomes: 0.75, 0.8, 0.75 which is clearly not in ascending order.
If A =5, the list becomes 3/5, 5/5, 75% which clearly is 0.6, 1, 0.75 which is also not in ascending order.
For any value of A greater than 5, the second term A/5 is greater than 1 thus being less than the third term 0.75.
Therefore there is no whole number A that makes the list true.