1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Galina-37 [17]
3 years ago
6

This was the forced migration of the Cherokee Indians to Oklahoma in 1838-39.

Social Studies
2 answers:
AfilCa [17]3 years ago
7 0
Trail of tears was the forced migration of the Cherokee Indians to oklahoma
Vaselesa [24]3 years ago
4 0
TRAIL OF TEARS is the forced migration of the Cherokee Indian to Oklahoma in 1838 to 1839.
As part of Andrew Jackson's Indian removal policy, in 1838 through 1839, the Cherokee were forced to gave up their lands and to migrate to another area, which is located in the modern day Oklahoma. The migration had devastating effects on the people and more than 4000 of them died.
You might be interested in
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
Population growth rates are
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Population growth is the increase in the number of individuals in a population.

Explanation: google

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The two views that identify the two possible sources of life's meaning are the __________ view and the __________ view.
Andre45 [30]

The two views that identify the two possible sources of meaning in life are the external view and the internal view.

In the external view, the meaning of life comes from outside humanity, as in some higher metaphysical order that is responsible for the functioning of the universe, such as belief in God.

In the internal view, the meaning of the purpose of life comes from the human being, that is, the purpose of life is justified through the significance of the purposes and objectives of life considered valuable by the individual.

Therefore, individuals can establish a vision about the meaning of life and be influenced by the socialization process and culture to which they belong, but this must be a personal choice and must be respected.

Learn more here:

brainly.com/question/24847869

4 0
3 years ago
Some individual states have abolished slavery in their constitutions. Confederation delegates Nevin Weinberg and Dani Kwatcher p
masya89 [10]

Answer

Yes

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation can solve this problem because since this issue deals on the national level, they can propose an amendment for the abolishment of slavery.

3 0
4 years ago
What are the two members of the Monera Kingdom?
kakasveta [241]

Bacteria and cyanobacteria is the best bet

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Using this graph, what can you conclude about Georgia's tax revenue? A.Sales taxes have increased. B.Corporate Income taxes have
    13·2 answers
  • True or False: Berkeley believed that there is a distinction between the world as it is in itself and the world as it appears.
    13·1 answer
  • Life in Texas cities and 1830s
    5·1 answer
  • Most teenagers need _____ to _____ hours of sleep per night.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true?
    9·2 answers
  • What is/are the benefits of having a health plan?
    10·1 answer
  • 18. Which General Staff member negotiates and monitors contracts, maintains documentation for reimbursement, and oversees timeke
    11·1 answer
  • ________ involves tactics used by police interviewers that fall short of physical abuse but still pressure suspects to divulge i
    7·1 answer
  • According to functionalist theorists, older persons retire from the workplace and begin withdrawing from positions of influence
    6·1 answer
  • I need it now! Select all the correct answers. Jennifer has a limited amount of water at home because of a problem with her pipe
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!