Answer:
Explanation: Ritual may be explained as a an habitual event usually associated with a particular situation or event such that it follows a defined order or sequence of programmes performed in accordance to a particular religious or cultural ideology. Rituals usually follow a cultural pattern as rituals associated with different cultures are numerous and usually slated based on the cultural concept or ruling of the sect. Some cultural rituals include birth rituals performed during child birth, Funerals performed upon demise of a person, Marriage rituals performed when having a spouse and so many others. However, differences occur in the modes of performance of these rituals based on the differences in cultural perception, guidelines and belief.
I believe the answer is: <span>Connection vs. Autonomy
</span><span>The state of mind that experienced by Carlos could be explained by Connection vs. Autonomy, a situation when an individual possess a conflicting needs to be both in a good relationship with other people (connnection) and become independent/able to control one's own life (autonomy)</span>
Answer:
benefits
it improves the quality of life for each people and household
it allow us to become more productive
industrialization make goods and services more affordable
problems
the rise of specialist profession
the rapid evolution of labour saving invention
I HOPE THIS HELPS
Answer:
A cultural heritage is a tradition or landmark that is specific to one group of people. A world heritage is when that tradition or landmark is meant to be recognised by other groups of people as deserving respect and preservation.
Explanation:
When a justice avoids interpreting the Constitution past its clear words, this is<u> judicial restraint.</u> But when a justice considers wider societal applications in decisions, this is<u> judicial activism. </u>
<h3>What are judicial activism and restraint?</h3>
Judicial activism refers to when a Judge/ Justice decides to consider the implications of their decisions when making court rulings. This can often lead to them making inferences on the Constitution.
This is the opposite of Judicial Restraint where a Judge/ Justice decides to interpret a law within the clear confines and words of the Constitution.
Find out more on Judicial Restraint at brainly.com/question/15452280.