ANSWER:
I’m assuming you are writing about factory life? I recommend using the template provided to guide with writing this article. It also mentions that you need to include those three points (daily life, conditions, and effect on woman)… Perhaps you could write from the perspective of either a man or woman during this time period and mention the conditions (ex: like a daily/everyday routine on your life in the factory). Furthermore, to include effects on woman, I’m assuming woman had it much worse (so you can compare how your life as a “man” is different than those of “woman”).
Finally at the end, share/read aloud your article to anyone you know and get their reaction to the harsh or maybe even relatable experience to factory life/work.
Hope this helps clarify your assignment! Feel free to ask more questions if you need help.
Hello there.
<span>What do Americans value as the basic individual or natural rights?
</span><span>Equality, freedom, and justice.</span><span>
</span>
Answer: How were young people of the 1920s more independent than their parents? Because they took advantage of the economy and got jobs. ... What kinds of social conflicts developed during the 1920s? Racial social conflicts developed, and rural traditions against urban traditions.
Explanation:Think about there economy then ours.
The Coriolis effect is the result of "the rotation of Earth on its axis".
<u>Answer:</u> Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Coriolis force occurs either inertial or imaginary. That works on objects in movement within a reference frame that rotates in support of an inertial frame. The influence of the effect of Coriolis depends on velocity of Earth and object or substance which is being deflected by the Coriolis effect. For long distances or high velocities, Coriolis effect influence is priority.
This effect explains the wind variations in North Hemisphere to the right initiated by the earth's rotation on its axis. The Coriolis Effect accounts to the wind's circular motion around pressure systems that shift weather patterns in south-eastern USA.
Communism is not about a redistribution of wealth. Communism argues that wealth is unequally distributed in the first place because capitalism is inherently unfair, and that redistributing wealth (by taking from rich people and giving to poor people) would never solve the problem in the long term. Communism therefore seeks to eliminate capitalism altogether by eliminating markets, by giving the government control of the means of production (like factories and farms), and by distributing goods (like food and gasoline) to people according to need. The goal is to eliminate economic classes by eliminating need, so that there's no need to redistribute wealth, since everyone would be in an equal condition of prosperity. In practice, however, this has never really worked out.
