after reading this i think that the answer is B, because their perspective is made by personal experiences
Answer:
Keep fighting - advantage: the U.S. army had the upper hand in the war by the time Truman became president, and it was likely that military Japan for defeat would be only a matter of time (even if very costly if both money and lives).
Disadvantage - before considering (and making) the atomic bomb, defeating Japan required a full invasion of the Japanese archipelago, which would have been very costly, because the Japanese, even in face of defeat, would fight fiercely and defend each island. They would not surrender by any means.
Talk to the Japanese - advantage: holding negotiation talks with the Japanese would be less costly for American taxpayers, and result in less American deaths than invading Japan.
Disadvantage - the Japanese did not trust the Americans and viceversa, and the talks could have gone nowhere, allowing Japan to rebuild some forces, and counterattack.
Explanation:
Answer:
Oil
Explanation:
When overproduction occurred, it create a situation when the stock of the products far outnumbered the amount of people who are wiling to buy it. As a response, sellers started to reduce the price of the oil in order to make consumers more interested to buy it.
This caused a massive fall in oil price during the 1930s. Before the over production, the cost of oil at that time was around $ 1.88 / Barrel. After the overproduction, it became around 65 cents per barrel .
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Yes. The Founding Fathers were very influenced by the Enlightenment movement, especially by the philosopher John Locke. ... Because of that, the Founding Fathers justified the rebellion against the British.
I would say that World War Two is a continuation of World War One because without Germany losing World War One Hitler would not have been able to take power in Germany. Another reason would be that without World War One Mussolini would not have had the right political climate to take power in Italy.
