1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Brut [27]
3 years ago
9

How did the stuarts deal with parliament

History
1 answer:
velikii [3]3 years ago
3 0
The Stuarts (King James I and his son King Charles I) were absolutists who believed that a monarch has a divine right to their authority and is responsible only to God (not Parliament or the people). This view proved to be problematic because it directly countered long standing English traditions and angered Parliament in a major way. As a result, James spent the majority of his rule fighting Parliament over government spending (which Parliament controlled), and Charles just straight up refused to summon Parliament from 1629 onward. (He was forced to call them in 1640 due to his fears of a Scottish invasion, resulting in the "Long Parliament," the Triennial Act, and eventually the English Civil War where he got beheaded but the question is most likely referring to the stuff before that.)
You might be interested in
Please help me with question 9
ki77a [65]
I’m pretty sure the first one to, so sorry if wrong
4 0
3 years ago
In what ways did the hebrews monotheistic religion differ from the people around them
seropon [69]

It is an interesting question but it is necessary to contextualize it.

First of all, hebrew is any member of ancient northern semitic people that were ancestors of the Jews, this definition is according Britannica Book.

But if I Have to mention the Bible the Hebrews was the Town of God defined in the Antique Testament  and they had roles and commandments   from God to follow. They had a sacerdote or lead who always talked with God and after communicated the messages for the People. One different from the people around them was that they can not eat murder animals and don't get idols of wood or someone else.

Now if we does check the new testament, the hebrews just believed in the Law of  Moses and it was very different of pharisees, sadducees and son of them didn't believe in Jesus Christ.

Nowadays these different of doctrine about God are alive and they have produced serious conflict between nations and people.





3 0
3 years ago
Describe the relationship of the government with the people in Democratic Republic of Congo?
Bess [88]

Answer:

DRC has a mixed economic system which includes a variety of private freedom, combined with centralized economic planning and government regulation.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What does the President do as the Party Chief
RoseWind [281]

Answer:

He does a few things

Explanation:

In a governmental system, a party leader acts as the official representative of their political party. The party leader is typically responsible for managing the party's relationship with the general public.

Hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
According to the Pearsall Plan, why should the state
docker41 [41]

Answer:

1.  to give the legislature the power to pass new laws

2.  to discourage racial mixing

3.  to retain public support

Explanation:

The Pearsall Plan, which was a response of the North Carolina to the ruling of the United States Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of racial segregation in public schools.

Created in 1956, Pearsall Plan sought a moderate approach to mix their public schools, however, in the bid to achieve their goal, the plan gave reason the state (North Carolina) should amend her Constitution, to reach common ground on the issue. The following are the reasons given:

1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws: this enable the legislature to passed legislation that delay the integration.

2. to discourage racial mixing: there is also amendment of Compulsory School Attendance Law which excused students from going to integrated schools, there by discouraging racial mixing in public schools.

3. to retain public support of school: the plan seek to give more power to the school board which in turn, helps to retain public school supports.

Thereafter, in the case of Godwin v. Johnston County Board of Education (1969), ruled the Pearsall Plan unconstitutional.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the 1800’s, thousands of people settled throughout the western region of United States and British Columbia. Boomtowns quickl
    7·1 answer
  • Religion and ancestry were the two main factors that defined the differences among Canadians by the end of the 18th century. Tru
    11·1 answer
  • What were two main focus of the Reagan administration?
    9·1 answer
  • African kingdoms benefited from the slave trade through all the following EXCEPT
    13·2 answers
  • Which war resulted in territorial gains for the United States that caused sectional conflict in the years leading up to civil wa
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the colonists dislike the boston tea party?
    5·1 answer
  • What are the social and political aspects of medieval Japanese society?
    13·1 answer
  • The "long march" of China was led by
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following conclusions is supported by the data in this table?
    6·1 answer
  • Who were the first 20 presidents in alphabetical order?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!