I believe the correct answer among the choices listed above is option B. When the Senate and the House of Representatives pass different versions of the same bill, the <span> two legislative bodies form a conference committee in order to make a compromise.</span>
The government control over businesses would decline.
They <span>Studies Oriental languages and avoids the science majors.
Both of them perceive that their imagination is to vivid to be focusing on science and they also have long-life desire to learn philosophy.
Because of this, they see study of oriental language (such as Arabic, chinese, latin) would open up a wider path for them to deepen their knowledge on philosophy.</span>
The options are:
A). Not likely, because the sample is not random and thus probably not an accurate reflection of public opinion on the issue.
B). Not likely, because the sample size is too small.
C). Not likely, because a poll is only a snapshot of what people think at the time a poll is taken.
D). Yes, because the magazine has a national circulation and the sample size is sufficiently large.
Answer:
E). Not likely, because the sample is not random and thus probably not an accurate reflection of public opinion on the issue.
Explanation:
As per the given description, the two-third letters received by the magazine out of 1500 letters favoring the stricter rules against talking on the cell phone during driving 'can not be considered an accurate public opinion because the sample has not been taken randomly to reflect the exact opinion of the people.' Another key reason is that <u>the audience of the news magazine includes a specific group of people who do not represent the entire population correctly</u>. Secondly, <u>even out of the ones who read it a very little percentage of people would take efforts to write about it after reading the article</u>. Thus, it is not an accurate public opinion.
The purpose was for Hammurabi (sometimes written "Hammurapi") to set down a reasonable and unchanging set of laws that addressed common problems in his kingdom. The code was especially important because, up until that time in history, there really were not any wide-spread laws that unified such a large group of people.
Before this, justice in many places would have been in the vigilante style, i.e. if someone in your small village steals your cow, it's most likely up to you and your family to go find it and then punish the perpetrator. The punishment for stealing might have been being lashed with a whip, for example, in one town and yet five miles away in another town the punishment was having a hand cut off. Under the code, everyone was eligible for the same punishments and fines no matter where they went. With one law from the king on down, there was less risk of being hanged or stoned for something relatively minor, or starting a never-ending feud between families over a disputed punishment
