Part A:
The number of outcomes that each of them will have to choose anyone at random is calculated below.
n = 3 x 3 = 9
This is because, Al will have 3 choices and similarly, Bill will also have three choices. These outcomes are as written below.
S = (1,1), (1,2), (1,3), (2, 1), (2,2), (2, 3), (3, 1), (3, 2), and (3,3)
Part B: To make the same choice, there will only be three outcomes. These are:
S = (1, 1), (2, 2) and (3, 3)
Part C: If neither of them will vote for 2, there will only be four outcomes. This is because each of them will only have two choices. These are:
S = (1, 1), (1, 3), (3, 1), and (3,3)
Answer:
Account titles and explanation Debit Credit
bad debt expense $16,800
allowance for d
doubtful account $16,800
Explanation:
Aging of accounts =5% of accounts receivable
Which is 360,000 x 5% = 18,000 expected allowance
current balance before adjustment =1,200 credit
Adjustment = 18,000 - 1,200 = 16,800
Adjusting entry BY Tanning Company
Account titles and explanation Debit Credit
bad debt expense $16,800
allowance for d
doubtful account $16,800
Answer:
4400 Unfavorable
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the labor rate variance for the month
First step is to calculate the Standard hours using this formula
Standard hours = Standard labor-hours per unit of output*Actual output
Let plug in the formula
Standard hours= 4.5*1,300 units
Standard hours= 5850
Now let calculate the Direct labor efficiency variance using this formula
Direct labor efficiency variance = (Standard hours - Actual hours)*Standard rate
Let plug in the formula
Direct labor efficiency variance= (5,850-6,100)*17.60
Direct labor efficiency variance= 4400 Unfavorable
Therefore the labor rate variance for the month is 4400 Unfavorable
Answer: Option D
Explanation: In the given case, southwestern has been displayed as an american organisation . Therefore, it cannot employ any non citizen who do not have proper kind of paper work done that is needed by the authorities of the country.
Hence, the geographic advantages regarding employment does not mean anything in front of the legal formalities and rules that resides in the economic area.
Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.
